carrolldunham

8 ms·

31.
by carrolldunham 3y ago
what on earth do people think neoliberalism means suddenly? it means free trade but out of nowhere I see zoomers treating it like it's some kind of bogeyman?
32.
by carrolldunham 3y ago
As a possible counterpoint to LLMs atrophying writing, in order to have fun on Character.AI, and tease out nuances with various GPTs, I've had to dust off my ability to write/think. I notice a lot more verbal reasoning going on in
33.
by carrolldunham 3y ago
It didn't fail logic, it failed to read your string. You didn't even notice that the terms being added in the 'show working' version don't match the given strings. And you are elsewhere talking about adding spaces t
34.
by carrolldunham 3y ago
the linked blog is yet another instance of making false inferences from the false assumption of the model working at a letter/symbol level. it cannot see letters. it cannot see the 1 or 0 in 11010 either. (note that a request to simply
35.
by carrolldunham 3y ago
Anything to do with counting words or letters, manipulating letters, etc is just leading to false inferences about the power of the model, because it doesn't work with words and letters but tokens. It can't see words.
36.
by carrolldunham 3y ago
I don't know what you're arguing here but that kind of reinforces anti-nasalism's point. It implies that 'natalism' persists only by meta factors and is therefore false/illegitimate in itself.
37.
by carrolldunham 3y ago
I'd like to hide the submissions about hiding GPT submissions
38.
by carrolldunham 3y ago
It's not a mistake. It's just ambiguous - you and the OP (rather than "humans") share some contextual assumptions that to you make it imply one meaning. If someone asked me with no context to 'be william gibson pit
39.
by carrolldunham 3y ago
I always get pushback for this but I think the idea that adults 'hang out with friends' is a meme from sitcoms. I think people grew up absorbing sitcom premises as representing life. I look at my parents and grandparents they don&
40.
by carrolldunham 3y ago
Change the name of expert mode. You're having to tell each single user to turn it on, because probably like me they think it means "answer as if talking to an expert"
41.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
anyone using it is shown a page saying this bot makes things up
42.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
It's fine, because there's two groups of people - people who know when you install it to turn off Cortana and online stuff, and people who don't know that, who, it turns out also tend to think "ooh, a garlic festival?&qu
43.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
I mean, if you wanted to add no value to GPT, yes. The value of any 'read a pdf' app should be that it traverses the full document as needed for a query, copying into its internal context what may be relevant, re-iterating until t
44.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
>would it also answer specific questions about the doc? Yes.
45.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
The 'creative tone' mode of Bing was upgraded to 'large context size', presumably 32K. By unstated (I've changed my post now) I meant that it doesn't report back "that's too long", it just says &
46.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
Bing can do this (with GPT-4) but the problem is it has an unacknowledged limit to the amount it's able to read, and so it mishandles summarizing a large document, seeming to read the start and a few random pages. How does yours handle
47.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
I think you need to consider conditional statistics. "What are high probability options for the next word, given that the text i'm working on starts with the words please rhyme, and that the text 10 words ago was 'sun' a
48.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
ChatGPT cannot search the web. Bing and Bard search the web. If ChatGPT doesn't know about your topic it just lies. Bing will ground its answers in web results. Bard is supposed to do that but isn't smart enough for it to work app
49.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
> People expect searches for factual information to be inaccurate probably 1 in 10,000 times. It's okay they've recently cooled this off with google's 'answers' or whatever they are called that are placed on top
50.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
The examples look like cartoons, have artefacts and are quite obviously the output of AI to anyone who has ever seen it, which at this point is a lot of people. Even someone who never saw stable diffusion generations is going to be wonderin
51.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
I, from the start, visualised the coffee cup having a lid. The author seems to have a blind spot in his assumption it doesn't. To me "coffee cup" slightly implies a lid because arguably a ceramic mug is simply "a cup&quo
52.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
>"It doesn't 'really know'..." You write this out as if this is an idea you formed yourself and not a tired/expired talking point - it's such a funny comment because it's pure regurgitation, but t
53.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
The title excited me - maybe someone succeeded making new art that looks like the old pre-renders, maybe a convincing imitation of the scanline render look. Instead it was a vapid article about tossing pixel art into img-2-img and getting s
54.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
pouring water and olive oil into some self-raising wholemeal flour and throwing it on a hot pan to make naans (90 seconds to cook) twice a day, comes in under $1/day and 30min/day with washup. for one person
55.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
>It felt like he was just purely on the defensive against 'big archeology' from the very get go, This is specifically the play though, it's what triggers some kind of mind-blow response in people's minds - don'
56.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
>it seems safe to assume that the decline of our social lives is a worrisome development. Gee ok, could we get any basis for that at all? >Because people said they like things with their friends When did they say that? Presumably befo
57.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
Isn't it just buddhist Anatta? What is the point of trying to re-invent the wheel from scratch?
58.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
Out of date time wasting clickbait. The actual news is this: TeamYouTube: >we added new tabs for different content types & when adding these tabs, we ran into issues keeping all the sorting options you're used to (like oldest to
59.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
Then you spend your whole PhD reinventing a wheel that has a different name in the 30 year old textbook from the next field over, and neither your peers or professor have any awareness of that
60.
by carrolldunham 4y ago
> the standard model for the underlying process is a normal distribution. I don't think it is, though?

More ›