carlisle_

26 ms·

1. 241.▲
   by carlisle_ 14y ago

   >hoping That's why you test - so you know whether or not something works. Additionally, there are significantly more important factors to consider than whether or a particular OS runs your application.
2. 242.▲
   by carlisle_ 14y ago

   Looks pretty harmless to me. I dunno why people are getting so worked up over it.
3. 243.▲
   by carlisle_ 14y ago

   I'm no lawyer, but I do not believe it's possible, or at least it's highly unlikely that somebody would go to jail should they not pay up in a patent case ruling against them. If anything you'll have your assets seized and you'll file bankr
4. 244.▲
   by carlisle_ 14y ago

   Right, because the civil legal system means you're going to jail if you don't comply! It's not a system where the loser goes to jail, don't pass go, don't collect $200. Libertarians crack me up. They're more disconnected from reality than t
5. 245.▲
   by carlisle_ 14y ago

   Somebody explained up above, but one example is that it can be used to mitigate collisions. If you have a company merge with another, and both are using 10.0.0.0/8 you could spend a lot of time and money renumbering or you could use unadver
6. 246.▲
   by carlisle_ 14y ago

   I feel like a lot of the issues raised in that article aren't as relevant anymore. The issue of IPv6 only clients communicating over IPv4 can be solved via tunneling in both directions. Reading over that article again, it really does seem l