capo

12 ms·

121.
by capo 14y ago
"... has entered into an agreement to be acquired by Google!". Does that mean that they are expecting some sort of regulatory review before it's a done deal or is it just standard speak?
122.
by capo 14y ago
You shouldn't be so quick to start lobbing accusations, Google employees can't just access emails and in cases they do, there are procedures in place, also they would be able to do so without triggering the "unusual activity" warning. Here
123.
by capo 14y ago
which means pennies for every hundred user, the support is good enough for ~free.
124.
by capo 14y ago
My point is that for the price of "free" their support is good enough. Not to mention that they did so to protect your account.
125.
by capo 14y ago
You have my sympathies and all but this is getting annoying, every once in awhile the HN front page gets cluttered with these sorts of posts, wait the day out it’s not that unreasonable. Complaining when not even half way through the design
126.
by capo 14y ago
What "other social network"? Google, + ,and YouTube accounts are on their way to becoming one (if they aren't already).
127.
by capo 14y ago
Then it could well evolve further. I don't see a need for the "dislike" button.
128.
by capo 14y ago
5 start rating used to be a "core part of YouTube".
129.
by capo 14y ago
A pat on the back and a monetary reward for not fucking up?! even through it ultimately didn't matter? it's amazing how low the bar is set for politicians.
130.
by capo 14y ago
No. If they are to enable you to share a document you need to give them license to do so. If they are to create copies of the files across datacenters and employ OCR on images and use that to improve their algorithms, they need to inlucde t
131.
Tell HN: No, Google Drive’s TOS does NOT grant them ownership of your files.
17 points by capo 14y ago|4 comments
132.
by capo 14y ago
No. They adhere to DMCA takedowns: We respond to notices of alleged copyright infringement and terminate accounts of repeat infringers according to the process set out in the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The rest is covered by t
133.
by capo 14y ago
No it doesn't! how many times are we going to go over this!? It's amazing how FUD spreads like wildfire. http://www.google.com/policies/terms/ You retain ownership of any intellectual property rights that you hold in that content. In sho
134.
by capo 14y ago
Exactly, not to mention that these are the TOS for all Google services and key language in that text specify that some services are treated differently: http://www.google.com/policies/terms/ Also, in some of our Services, there are terms
135.
by capo 14y ago
It's a bit lazy (not to say deceitful) that OP chose not to provide links to the full text, thus ignoring key language and caveats. http://www.google.com/policies/terms/ Your Content in our Services Some of our Services allow you to subm
136.
by capo 14y ago
Post a link next time, not a conveniently truncated image: http://www.google.com/policies/terms/ Your Content in our Services Some of our Services allow you to submit content. You retain ownership of any intellectual property rights that
137.
by capo 14y ago
As I understand it "Drive" will be the new name for the "Document List", the documents themselves (spreadsheets, presentations, etc) will still be referred to as Google Docs.
138.
by capo 14y ago
As I see it 90% of Google+'s purpose is to get users to create profiles and then these popup within Google properties in the form of picture thumbnails when the user comments or uploads stuff, etc. Which is perfectly reasonable as almost al
139.
Selling Digital Fear(techcrunch.com)
1 points by capo 15y ago|0 comments
140.
by capo 15y ago
I imagine if the advertisers weren't receiving refunds they would be the ones contemplating a class action.
141.
by capo 15y ago
So when they are lenient with policing ads they get sued for click-fraud and when they are strict then the government should intervene?! surly there must be a third option.
142.
Is It Fair To Say That Red Hat Is The First Billion Dollar Open Source Company?(techdirt.com)
1 points by capo 15y ago|0 comments
143.
Google Apps Vault (eDiscovery service)(googleenterprise.blogspot.com)
1 points by capo 15y ago|0 comments
144.
by capo 15y ago
I frankly don't understand why some people are seemingly outraged with G+ and are trying to pin everything they perceive as wrong with google on its mere existence. I don’t see how G+ has effected search quality in any negative way, if SPYW
145.
by capo 15y ago
Interestingly the "enumerator" tool doesn't list all my extensions, and it lists even less when testing on the machine running the beta channel (18). Similar behavior Firefox exhibits regarding: http://ha.ckers.org/weird/firefox-extentions
146.
by capo 15y ago
We've introduced a new manifest version attribute in the extension manifest in Chrome 18 (currently in beta). When a developer updates his or her extension to use manifest_version 2, Chrome will enforce the following CSP policy by default:
147.
by capo 15y ago
Yup: https://panopticlick.eff.org/ Also: http://ha.ckers.org/weird/firefox-extentions.html
148.
by capo 15y ago
That's why they're transitioning to "manifest_version 2" (CSP): http://blog.chromium.org/2012/02/more-secure-extensions-by-d...
149.
by capo 15y ago
Video: http://www.ted.com/talks/rob_reid_the_8_billion_ipod.html
150.
Copyright Math: a quantitative reasoning master class by Rob Reid(arstechnica.com)
1 points by capo 15y ago|1 comments

More ›