capo

9 ms·

31.
by capo 14y ago
Or just store the account PIN outside the affected service.
32.
by capo 14y ago
It's very disappointing that DDG is resorting to the same whinny PR tactics as the less than savory competitors. It's fairly easy and straight forward to add DDG to Chrome or Android, much easier than other platforms in fact, you’re not bei
33.
by capo 14y ago
500 million public profiles. Must we go through the phonebook analogy again?!
34.
by capo 14y ago
According to the help forums similar error messages used to appear for those who had the toolbar installed (false positives detecting queries originating from non-humans). Have your friend preform searches on the encrypted site and report b
35.
by capo 14y ago
It's about this sort of fragmentation (vendor incompatibility): http://officialandroid.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-benefits-imp...
36.
Tech firms launch new website to fix patent mess(gigaom.com)
1 points by capo 14y ago|0 comments
37.
A more secure Flash Player for Chrome on Macs(chrome.blogspot.com)
1 points by capo 14y ago|0 comments
38.
by capo 14y ago
Intel inside this one: http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/acer-c7-chromeb...
39.
With Millions Paid in Hacker Bug Bounties, Is the Internet Any Safer?(wired.com)
1 points by capo 14y ago|0 comments
40.
by capo 14y ago
So... it wasn't a Google vulnerability.
41.
Bugs stomped in Chrome 23 stable(googlechromereleases.blogspot.com)
1 points by capo 14y ago|0 comments
42.
Why Google “Personalizes” Results On Obama But Not Romney (RE: DDG/WSJ FUD)(searchengineland.com)
1 points by capo 14y ago|0 comments
43.
by capo 14y ago
You migh find this useful: http://searchengineland.com/why-google-personalizes-results-...
44.
by capo 14y ago
Just so that everyone is on the same page on what is being discussed here: this is a “study” by a competitor who can't implement personalised search and thus is spreading FUD to spin that as a differentiating advantage. It might be a good m
45.
by capo 14y ago
The folks at Nextag (which by the way sells product listings without disclosing them and then complains about google: http://searchengineland.com/given-nextags-lack-of-transparen... ) are telling the same sob story to every reporter who wo
46.
by capo 14y ago
They have everything to do with the piracy and payment points raised, and I'd argue that a direct link can be charted between securing developer compensation and the availability of games. As for the title: being 2nd place is hardly a "deso
47.
by capo 14y ago
So beneath the baiting title the author's points boil down to "there are more exclusive games on iOS", and "Android owners are cheap pirates", there is no mention of paid app encryption nor the increasing payment options (carrier billing, g
48.
by capo 14y ago
I heard a rumor that Compute Engine was supposed to open to everyone today, I suppose this reinforces that rumor.
49.
Google Research: Large Scale Language Modeling in Automatic Speech Recognition(googleresearch.blogspot.com)
1 points by capo 14y ago|0 comments
50.
by capo 14y ago
Under "Voice Search" in settings try changing the default language to US English.
51.
New Google Search App With Siri-Like Voice Responses Finally Approved For iOS(searchengineland.com)
1 points by capo 14y ago|0 comments
52.
Android 4.2: What's New(android.com)
1 points by capo 14y ago|0 comments
53.
by capo 14y ago
Why did they use the most alarmist title possible if they were going to debunk it immediately after?!
54.
by capo 14y ago
This is a bunch of alarmist nonsense. For starters this is no "backdoor" it's front and center, and the author acts as if the concept of locking a user profile behind a password on the OS level is a completely foreign one. Client side softw
55.
by capo 14y ago
Of course the fact that it's free is relevant, your argument is about switching costs and in this case the costs are literally nil. Also their search is not a platform it's a service (no API).
56.
by capo 14y ago
Windows was a de facto standard on the desktop because it was the de facto developer platform and so it was the only choice for a reasonable consumer experience. Search on the other hand is user facing, and as Microsoft keeps telling us sea
57.
by capo 14y ago
Not sure if you've noticed but they are being investigated. Investigations however do not imply guilt, and this is not a criminal investigation so it's not analogous to your example. There is no clear and shut case here, no evidence of ca
58.
by capo 14y ago
Who said they broke the law? I'm no expert on antitrust law but as I understand the FTC will basically try to argue a theory in front of a judge, and if it's indeed concerning which results rank where it's not a particularly strong theory.
59.
by capo 14y ago
"lobbying works." both ways I guess. Lobbying made the FTC start a costly investigation and now they struggle to let go.
60.
Patents on Software: A Nobel Laureate’s View(nytimes.com)
2 points by capo 14y ago|0 comments

More ›