capnrefsmmat

43 ms·

391.
by capnrefsmmat 15y ago
I'm not sure I see why "I think Google has suspect motives" leads to the conclusion "Google+ Has Already Failed." The Internet has already shown that people trust those with suspect motives far too much.
392.
by capnrefsmmat 15y ago
I'd like to see a "we gave 5,000 people standing desks and tracked them for ten years" study.
393.
by capnrefsmmat 15y ago
Or just change the form so it POSTs to their secret evil server, rather than to the secure site.
394.
by capnrefsmmat 15y ago
Yes, there were a number of leak bugs fixed between 4 and 5, and the Mozilla guys are chasing after tons more. They've created a project specifically to chase down leaks and bloat issues, and you can see the various tracking bugs there: ht
395.
by capnrefsmmat 15y ago
Not necessarily. Install this extension and you'll be able to use any unsupported extensions: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/add-on-compat... It'll also let you report their compatibility back to Mozilla and the extension
396.
by capnrefsmmat 15y ago
> The DNSSEC stapled data is embedded in an X.509 certificate (as opposed to extending TLS or using a different certificate format) because every HTTPS server will take an X.509 certificate as an opaque blob and it Just Works. All the o
397.
by capnrefsmmat 15y ago
Have you considered some sort of pay-by-usage (by time, by bandwidth, whatever) plan for people who don't know how often they'll need a VPN? It's not every month that I'm in a hotel or a coffee shop, so it's hard to justify a monthly subscr
398.
by capnrefsmmat 16y ago
Kindles have built-in support for highlighting and annotations, although using the buttons to highlight is surely slower than using a physical highlighter. If you're just highlighting important passages and not every other sentence (as some
399.
by capnrefsmmat 16y ago
If you believe that's it, do a thorough check of your system -- the associated bug report says it's due to malware interacting badly with Firefox.
400.
by capnrefsmmat 16y ago
That's probably a good idea. My guess is one of your extensions hasn't been properly updated for FF 4, but I'm not really sure. Also use Plugin Check: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/plugincheck/
401.
by capnrefsmmat 16y ago
From the ones that loaded, it looks like you've been hitting this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605290 If you're on Windows, you could help by capturing a minidump, since it looks like they don't have much useful infor
402.
by capnrefsmmat 16y ago
Firefox is in the process of being made multi-process; they've successfully achieved that for Fennec, the mobile version, and will eventually port that code back to the desktop Firefox.
403.
by capnrefsmmat 16y ago
Firefox 4 still uses GDI on Windows XP for font rendering. I'm surprised, because the majority of the complaints came from its switch to DirectWrite on Vista and 7; DirectWrite still has display issues, though they're Microsoft's problem, n
404.
by capnrefsmmat 16y ago
This may be helpful: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Canvas_tutorial/Using_image...