caminante

5 ms·

31.
by caminante 3mo ago
Even if they wouldn't have made the 32 team bracket, these Cinderella stories are propaganda like the NCAA uses to monetize "student athletes". It's an excuse to squeeze more money out of the brand with a lower quality p
32.
by caminante 3mo ago
Not really. In practice, skipping the line is THE approach. How many times do you hear people say to fill out online job postings? Never. It's just scaring off good/bad candidates and bums who dont have an employee referral. It&#x
33.
by caminante 3mo ago
Use it in your favor. You just have to get past the recruiter/talent acquisition where everyone else is getting auto-rejected. You should be doing that anyway.
34.
by caminante 3mo ago
You forgot your $3 payout from the class action lawsuit when the company STILL gets hacked and the exec bonus pool increases because the settlement wasn't "that" bad.
35.
by caminante 3mo ago
Liebreich hates green/hydrolysis because it's much more expensive (due to inefficiencies) and wasteful of green electrons compared to final consumption alternatives.
36.
by caminante 3mo ago
Reads like a hallucinated writeup to me.
37.
by caminante 4mo ago
Yes. Biden did it in his last month. Disregard this parent's bias. As I mentioned above, it's not fringe to ban Chinese hardware for security concerns. They've been surreptitiously planting undisclosed control equipment. [0]
38.
by caminante 4mo ago
"Silly? Pretend?" You might want to re-evaluate your political bias. There is precedent. And it's not just the US that's concerned about Chinese stealth tech. [0] https://www.reuters.com/sustainability&#x
39.
by caminante 4mo ago
Did you mean to reply to a different comment? I don't see any of those on the mozillafoundation page, per @andsoitis.
40.
by caminante 4mo ago
Good luck. The renewables overbuild required to firm baseload demand for a datacenter is insane. You need something like 4x solar and 1.5x storage in a 10hr battery. Respectfully, the laws of NPV and IRR hurdles don't matter in Chinese
41.
by caminante 4mo ago
I agree directionally and appreciate your effort. I might just be misunderstanding and wrong, which forgive me if you feel like that's the case. I just don't find the author's point consistent or nuanced about when to apply t
42.
by caminante 4mo ago
Profits still ain't easy. Cheap gas is great, but 2.67GW of new build natural gas in this market will cost $6-8 billion in fixed costs. You need wholesale pricing of ~$50-60/MWh ... OVER 25 years! ... to recover just the fixed cos
43.
by caminante 4mo ago
You left out: > ask them for permission I humbly submit you're still glossing over this. This framing is subtle. There's a difference between getting a peer review from your boss and asking your boss for permission when you t
44.
by caminante 4mo ago
That's part of my point. I'm assuming you don't disagree that this "lighting a fuse" approach on something you're unsure about without manager approval (and you think you need their permission -- which is said
45.
by caminante 4mo ago
You know the "no response" happens all the time. OK. I'm your pointy haired boss Thursday morning. > Hey, @waisbrot. You didn't mention anything in your note whether you got a response from the Sales team. I got a ca
46.
by caminante 4mo ago
> The only place you're in disagreement is that you don't see any room for nuance when something is your job but worth notifying the boss about in advance. You read a different article. FTA: > ”Hey, boss, I am going to in
47.
by caminante 4mo ago
No. It's just CYA hedging. If it's your job (per the "context"), then do it. When you ask this question, it's either A. escalating/DoA exception (not your authority) B. Or giving yourself an out if something go
48.
by caminante 4mo ago
Oh, so it's a live blog with updates and a dynamic headline.
49.
by caminante 4mo ago
Rest doesn't make sense either with the parent's tautologies and self-counters. They seem to argue for it and raise the challenges. ~"Speed doesn't matter unless you need it." ~"LLMs can be good, but if you don
50.
by caminante 5mo ago
> You “quoted”...That’s a summary! But not a quote. Look again! [0] It's a tagline for a photo that you overlooked. Please take a break and go outside. [0] https://i.postimg.cc/XvW4pN8Q/image.png
51.
by caminante 5mo ago
> No, there was a bunch in the middle that you removed. I didn't remove anything. It seems you're reading and responding to different discussions.
52.
by caminante 5mo ago
Please don't be unreasonable. > Every single thing in the text you (inaccurately) quoted. Your first sentence makes no sense. It's quoted directly from the Guardian article, not from me. > it sounds like the point is to m
53.
by caminante 5mo ago
"This" ? Which this ? They apparently moved the location, but protesting at the new location is still heavily restricted [0] with a dystopian narrative. > In order to achieve the balance between the rights of those holding a
54.
by caminante 5mo ago
LOL! >City Hall sits entirely on a private estate owned by a Kuwaiti investment company. Protesters are not allowed to gather without corporate permission.
55.
by caminante 5mo ago
I thought I'd heard of this but couldn't find enough examples of this, let alone an FBI induced landing. It appears REALLY hard to step over jurisdictions. I did find the PLO terrorist incident from 1985. The terrorists killed an
56.
by caminante 5mo ago
This is a pro-IBM piece. I'm surprised it has zero mention of potential advantages of trapped ion despite being superior on stability windows, accuracy, and operating temps. I also appreciate the disclosure about AI generated content,
57.
by caminante 5mo ago
> Complaining about 2:1 immigrant to local birth rate has absolutely nothing to do with long-time permanent residents (who are locals) Wrong again. They're locals and overseas-born immigrants .
58.
by caminante 5mo ago
Here you are again [0], unable to represent comments in good faith. Nobody said "non-white" and it isn't even implied because a significant proportion -- 35-40% of Australian Permanent Residents (US green card equivalent) --
59.
by caminante 5mo ago
>I know you're going to... Well, I'm apparently not in the imagined conversation you're having. Seems insecure to pre-bake an out for a hypothetical. Never rejected systemic racism exists, but calling everything racist w
60.
by caminante 5mo ago
That's a strawman. Even so, you're "having trouble" acknowledging a singular fact that calls a claim into question? Is two facts the magic number? Three? Why is one insufficient? It'd be more effective to offer an a

More ›