Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
camelite
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
151.
▲
by
camelite
12y ago
100% make this clear from the outset. I "stopped" at the create account screen because I didn't want to go through the trouble just for some teaser videos. I hopped over to the hn comments to find out what the deal was.
152.
▲
by
camelite
12y ago
I really enjoyed those! Seems like you've real talent: "After my speech tonight one little boy came up to me and said simply, "I'm hungry". I wanted to take him in my arms and tell him: "I feel it too, champ. I
153.
▲
by
camelite
12y ago
<i>13) "In August 2013, the Goldman automated trading system generated a bunch of crazy and embarrassing trades that lost Goldman hundreds of millions of dollars..." Yes, but this was on the Options market, on Options exchan
154.
▲
by
camelite
12y ago
Still reading. On #6, I never got that impression; Lewis refers repeatedly to the digitalisation of the exchanges bringing prices down. e.g.: 75.73%: "A few thought it was important to remember that technology had lowered their trading
155.
▲
by
camelite
12y ago
I'm in the middle of the book. Point 10, "Without co-location, the investors will fight for the spaces close to the exchange -- across the street, a block away, 2 blocks away, etc.", seems to my unsophisticated reading to be
156.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
It's important to get your facts right before you leap to someone's defense, or castigate others for withholding judgement. If you look at vadsye's link[1] to the Nov 2011 investment announcement, you'll see that Sarveet
157.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
Yes, that's obvious now I've re-read your comment.
158.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
So sexism is bad then. I guarantee you this is not something "you can't say", or goes against today's moral fashion.
159.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
A closer "male" analog to nurses is cops.
160.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
> No. But if she quits because she felt the environment was sexist, then yes. What if she feels she's Jesus... is she therefore Jesus? She also felt a bunch of guys watching some girls hula-hooping was sexist... and that the word &q
161.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
>But with regard to this specific case, since you say that you see no evidence at the original link, I would urge you to think about the fact that you evidently do not consider Julie's own words that she has been harassed to be evid
162.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
> Where is the contradiction? You referenced, approvingly I assume, emphasizing "potential" over skill in admissions. You'd like for it not to unfairly impact boys who've had a genuine interest since a young age. Unfo
163.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
Your comment is self-contradicting: If there's a "giant" gap between boys who start young and girls or boys who don't, then acknowledging that gap at the application stage is not preferential treatment. Ignoring it becau
164.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
Her accomplishments stand on their own.
165.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
I didn't read the original comment as calling out "hackernews hypocrites" but rather the justice system.
166.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
Your comment makes sense to me only if you replace 'use' with 'distribution', though it becomes self-contradicting in the process.
167.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
The charge of whataboutism hinges upon the irrelevance of the counter-charge. Since the two are being accused here of exactly the same crime, the charge fails. Not to mention that, from reading the wikipedia article, the inspiration for t
168.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
That's 9 dicks I've counted now. Serious question - how comfortable would you all be with the casual use of 'cunt' or 'whore' in hackernews comments on gender issues? Really what I'm asking is, are you hyp
169.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
I found it icky, like a scientology training manual.
170.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
I'm not the person you asked the question of, but I'll dip my oar in anyway. Of the self-identified feminists I've come across, both online and in real-life, the vast majority of them subscribe to patriarchy theory. A standar
171.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
I can try to imagine I'm a woman, for sure, men are capable of empathy and compassion after all, but do I have to be a feminist?
172.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
"This resentment often falls into one of two categories, either "I don't know how to do this myself" (which is the lack of expertise) or "I don't want to do this so I'll hire someone" (which often is
173.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
How can I simplify the meaning of something I haven't attempted to define? How can I mischaracterise the nature of something I haven't attempted characterize?
174.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
A racist is less likely to have black friends than a non-racist. I'd suggest that a racist is even less likely to have black co-founders than a non-racist. edited to add: The reason the "look at my black friends" argument is
175.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
There's some very entertaining stuff at http://www.deepcapture.com/ . A good place to start is http://www.deepcapture.com/the-story-of-deep-capture-by-mark... or http://www.deepcapture.com&#x
176.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
I had just decided against posting the following flame-bait comment until I read this... Now I can't resist: "The problem with conspiracy theorists is that any argument questioning the existence of their pet conspiracy can and wil
177.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
<i> she points out that this was an irrational response provoked by her situation.</i> It's about perception all right, but you're missing the point: she as much as admits that it is her own perception of the situ
178.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
You must have missed the second part of his sentence. It begins with "if".
179.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
This must be one of the great fallacies of the age: Nobody's been sent to jail, therefore no one's provably guilty, therefore it's crazy for people to be complaining they're not in jail. The fact is, they're not in
180.
▲
by
camelite
13y ago
> Not "you should have known better." If by this you mean that ignorance is a defense, Sarbanes-Oxley was enacted specifically, in the wake of Enron, to remove this defense. CEOs sign a statement each year attesting that they
More ›