Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
calyth2018
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
calyth2018
3y ago
Engadget had been quite biased against BlackBerry for a long long time. "Crucially, though, it's not just like reading a Wikipedia entry. Johnson tells us exactly who Laziridis and Balsillie are from the very first scenes of the m
32.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
Like others pointed out, it's just manufacturing consent. The stated aim on the mainland side is reunification. Anyone with two brain cells would know that bombing a place to shit and then try to run it is going to be hell. See Iraq. T
33.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
Outside of the handful that was shot down, including the ones that were operated by the ROC in the late 70s, all the major power that has the means of doing this, to probe defenses, be it coastal, or inland AA, or whatever, have done thi
34.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_U-2_incident https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_SR-71_Blackbird You think the US doesn't do that now? If you do, I'd like to sell you the Brooklyn
35.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
So you develop a new anti-drone measure. Opponent drones comes in, you light up your brand new anti-drone measures, opponent drone gets telemetry, beams it out before it gets blown up. Opponent repeat it enough times, develops counter-meas
36.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
And what exactly should be done about it? If they hypothesis is true, that a bunch of these UFO are actually drones / balloon trying to provoke a response and gather telemetry, then isn't the act of reacting to it and trying to
37.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
ABit took a hit hard around those times.
38.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
Let's see if this ages like wine or ages like milk.
39.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
He's got an emerald in his mouth when he was born. Not sure if he ever had it.
40.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
Aged like milk indeed. Writing was on that wall a long long time ago. Thanks for pointing it out so that I could have a good laugh :D
41.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
Yeah no. Drives me nuts on the phone when people don't use the numbers field, so the VKB is not in the number pad mode automatically. A QWERTY vkb in numbers / symbols mode have tiny number keys compared to a number pad. If brows
42.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
Time to write a bland email, and brush up your resume.
43.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
I've gotten faint simply exiting an air-con'd MTR to the full heat 100% humidity at an outdoor station. It's a waste for the acclimatized locals.
44.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
It's hard to define best, as someone who watched a lot of it as a kid. For a pre-teen audience, Nausicaä of the valley of the wind, Castle in the Sky, Totoro, basically all the stuff before Princess Mononoke are great films. I see Prin
45.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
I took the "4 day" Toronto to Vancouver train around Christmas time 2019. It was eventful, they had a bad batch of wheel bearings, which got us stuck at Sudbury ON for a day. But despite that, it was a fun, low stress experience.
46.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
It wouldn't benefit the Taiwanese. It's plainly obvious that US does not want the PRC to have access to TSMC, or anything like it. And this suggestion from US military academics is most likely based on the fact that the US is not
47.
▲
by
calyth2018
4y ago
You're not wrong.
48.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
> All feedback is anonymous, rolled up with non-exit feedback, and delivered to managers/leads periodically so it can't be easily linked back. I think the Brooklyn bridge's on sale.
49.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
It's not that surprising. Taiwanese commentators on both sides of their political aisles have noted that Ukraine and Russia are both exporters of food and fertilizer. According to them, both exports will be severely affected. Buyers of
50.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
And this post is already flagged. Guess we're desperate for our Two Minute Hate, aren't we?
51.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
A far more likely case is that after seeing the discord sown by the DOJ, the Chinese authorities would try and entice the scientists. The fact that Hu goes back to U of Tennessee to protect his reputation is a bit like battered spouse. I wo
52.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
> I'm not sure why this perspective doesn't attract more attention these days. Because this perspective dampens the prevailing narratives, that Russia is spinning pure propaganda in regards to NATO?
53.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
NATO is an alliance led by the US. US drives most of the policy, but within NATO there’s still a lip service to get consensus within. US wants Ukraine in NATO is a given, because it would make neo-containment so much easier. The question
54.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
You understand that US is the principle architect of neo-containment since the iron curtain fell, since the 90s right. So of course US would want Ukraine to join.
55.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
These would be of interest for you: https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/16117-document-06-record-... https://archive.ph/gnqkv - among the signers who opposed the NATO expansion during the late 90s to in
56.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
> 1. Ukraine has wanted to join NATO for some time, and at at least some NATO countries have expressed a wish for it to join. Which ones? France and Germany weren't particularly too warm about it. Heck, NSC Anthony Lake to Clinton&
57.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
Oh, that was a possibility if they were willing to spend money on that in the face of famine and unrest, given a lot of the expertise there find themselves out of a job. I don't think their chances of surviving external pressures from
58.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
It's rational to do so, even if there are pressing issues within. And of course, the world's going to say any country wishing to do that is insane.
59.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
Both Russia and Ukraine at that point needed humanitarian help to stave off famine. Ukraine itself does not have the expertise to maintain the nukes, according to Sarotte's book. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/978
60.
▲
by
calyth2018
5y ago
Oh please, US would push back against UK's .280 British small arms cartridge[0] for NATO harmonization, despite there was already ample testing shown that the more powerful 7.62mm cartridge was nigh-uncontrollable in automatic fire. On
More ›