Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
calcifer
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
331.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
Well, let's just hope your business model doesn't get co-opted by a giant company one day. That would be horrible.
332.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
> Ultimately, Strava is trying to provide you some more insights using your health data. No, Strava is trying to monetize my data. That I can get some insights from their monetization attempts is incidental.
333.
▲
Twitter says it's looking at subscription options as ad revenue drops sharply
(edition.cnn.com)
45 points
by
calcifer
6y ago
|
61 comments
334.
▲
Ode to a Pager
(roguelazer.com)
4 points
by
calcifer
6y ago
|
1 comments
335.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
By this logic murder shouldn't be illegal because most people don't murder anyway?
336.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
> $60 for unlimited internet in 2007. That was a revolution. You mean their fake unlimited plan that resulted in a $60 million fine? That revolution? [1] https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/5/20949850/att
337.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
Science for its own sake is a noble pursuit. Not everything has to have commercial applications or to be "practical".
338.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
Seems like a useful service, but there is something quite ironic about having a video titled "The Risks of a Consolidating Internet" [1] hosted by Cloudflare. [1] https://cloudflare.tv/best-of/478d779664ac0f7a
339.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
> there was a sort of "email 2.0" spec called "Internet Mail 2000" by djb, that would have partly eliminated all this crap Sounds like they were advocating a solution to spam [1]. I wonder why it didn't work... [
340.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
> some people viewed this as a rant/criticism What makes you so sure that those people are wrong and you are right? There is this saying, I don't remember by who, that goes something like "If someone is an asshole, they&#
341.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
> I tend to do this far too often, and my goal is that it is not characterized as "going off at" people. So your goal is not to change your own behaviour, which by your own admission has been found annoying by others before,
342.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
I think we are talking about different things here. You, as an AMP engineer are talking about how Chrome implemented this [1], but I'm talking about how Chrome is not a user agent, because it demonstrably acts as Google's agen
343.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
> The useragent (browser) enforces this. This assumes the user agent is actually an agent of the user, and not the AMP provider, which is demonstrably [1] not the case. [1] https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews&#x
344.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
> a net improvement for security that allows sites to put less trust in third-party servers and scripts. Third parties like Google, right?
345.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
> the thing is there's a tool for a job Really? Which job do you belive needs a "maybe store some of this data, sometimes" kind of database?
346.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
> I didn't see multi-account containers mentioned Probably because that's not related to remote work and school?
347.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
There are excellent community KCLs for other languages, like Twitch's kinsumer [1] for Go. We've been using it in production with a high througput stream for almost a year now without any issues. [1] https://github.com&
348.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
> Intentional or not, this to me is no different from a scam. You don't get to redefine a word and then claim it fits the definition. Scam is intentional deception , which is most certainly not what's happenning here.
349.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
What other meaning do you think "develop Go on" could have?
350.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
> is this question referring to the platform the project is intended to run on? Or is it the platform people are actually using their IDE in? I think it's pretty obvious, no? "develop Go on" seems pretty self explanatory.
351.
▲
by
calcifer
6y ago
I've never once met a person who would otherwise go hungry if they didn't get dividends, have you? What you really mean is those "normal people" would have to sell their third car or maybe rent out their summer home wi
352.
▲
by
calcifer
7y ago
> That starts with shoes and any kind of clothing. Unless you are a designated critical worker who has to go out, you should be staying at home anyway and if you are doing that, why would clothes shopping be essential?
353.
▲
by
calcifer
7y ago
Indeed. Borrowing has never been cheaper.
354.
▲
by
calcifer
7y ago
Nobody drives for Uber and Lyft at the same time either.
355.
▲
by
calcifer
7y ago
One of the problems they've mentioned, large binaries, is being tracked [1] for the past 7 years and it's getting worse with every release. Not to mention compile times are still much longer than what they were pre-1.5 when the
356.
▲
by
calcifer
7y ago
> I would use whichever googles first and most relevant results are. The people who made the mistake in the OP probably did exactly that.
357.
▲
by
calcifer
7y ago
That's not correct. The implementation of "make", for example, looks like Go but isn't - it relies on internal details of the gc compiler that isn't part of the spec [1]. That's why a Go user can't imp
358.
▲
by
calcifer
7y ago
I gave an example a bit further up, here [1]. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22240223
359.
▲
by
calcifer
7y ago
Nothing you wrote contradicts what I said. You can't implement "make" in Go. The fact that you can implement some approximation of it with a worse signature and worse runtime behaviour (since it won't be compiler assis
360.
▲
by
calcifer
7y ago
> You have to distinguish between the features available to a Go program as the user writes it and the implementation of the language. I do, I'm just objecting to "Go is implemented in Go".
More ›