Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
caconym_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
241.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
Not only that, they also have a fairly conservative approach to design that seems to keep a lot of the stupid bullshit out of their cars. I own multiple late model Japanese cars from different manufacturers and have had zero issues with the
242.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
I can respect that but I honestly have no concept of how it's "supposed" to be pronounced. At least with Dog coin I know where I stand.
243.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
Good point!
244.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
Seems like generally it ended up being a surveillance play, in practice if not original intent. For example, Dog coin has been reported to be passing data taken from other agencies directly to ICE^[1] for law enforcement applications, and t
245.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
I wouldn't read too much into the timelines, as it seems that OpenAI simply broke an embargo that the other players were up to that point respecting: https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/07/openai-jumps-gun-on
246.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
> Interesting that traffic didn't return to completely normal levels after the incident. Anecdotally, I figured out their DNS was broken before it hit their status page and switched my upstream DNS over to Google. Haven't gotte
247.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
All my regular mobile devices are Apple, so whoever said that has it right. I also have a Linux laptop but NetworkManager support for Wireguard was broken last I checked, and at the time I didn't care enough to set it up by hand.
248.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
That's a comically uncharitable extrapolation on what was said.
249.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
+1. I have Wireguard set up on all my mobile devices and configured to automatically start when connecting to any wifi that isn't mine, so I can take my devices anywhere and I'm still on my home LAN. It works seamlessly and flawle
250.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
> if shit hit the fan and corrupted my Git files or stopped being maintained I'd be a duck out of water You should have the same concern with anything you're hosting yourself, and you should have 3-2-1 backups to mitigate that
251.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
> In point of fact this is actually an argument IN FAVOR of Obsidian. While the editor might be proprietary - the notes themselves are just standard markdown. If somehow all the copies of Obsidian magically disappeared off the earth tomo
252.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
If it was as obvious as you claim, the legal issues would already be settled, and your characterization of what LLMs are doing as "reading and summarizing" is hilariously disingenuous and ignores essentially the entire substance o
253.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
Okay!
254.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
Your guess is wrong! Maybe you should have written a substantive response to my comments instead of trying and failing to dunk on me. Maybe you don't understand as much as you think you do.
255.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
I drove my car to work today, and while I was at work I drove a meeting. Does this mean my car is a meeting? My meeting was a car? It turns out that some (many, in fact) words mean different things in different contexts . My comment makes
256.
▲
by
caconym_
1y ago
> Aren't humans themselves essentially human made? No, not in the sense in which the word "made" is being used here. > Maybe a better definition would be non-human (or inorganic if we want to include intelligence like e
257.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Relative to the hype they've been spinning to attract investment, casting the launch and commercialization of ChatGPT as their greatest achievement really is a quite significant downgrade, especially given that they really only got the
258.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
As much as you might think cherrypicking examples like Spotify (and characterizing them poorly, besides) supports your point, I don't think it's going to be practical to enumerate every single source of sales, royalties, and other
259.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Thank you for affirming your position! > Obviously there is zero point in corporations doing this as costs are near zero and competition for this infinite. Right now almost all art is available for free, it is just illegal. This is incre
260.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
If you don't actually think IP law should be outright abolished, your viewpoint is of a totally different species than that of the person I originally replied to, and we probably agree on more than we disagree on---in particular that t
261.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
> Not the OP, but I believe very strongly that once an idea has been expressed it should be free for others to build upon and share. That's how ideas work, naturally. > All of human culture is derivative. The current legal regime
262.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
In other words, (for instance) you believe in the right of massive corporations who control the lion's share of consumer distribution channels to, on an ongoing basis, scrape all authored content that is made publicly available in any
263.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Because weakening the USA is (and will remain so, regardless of any "peace" in Ukraine) one of their primary strategic goals, and they know Trump won't meaningfully punish them for something like this?
264.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Taking on all the monolithic complexity of Tailscale just to get NAT traversal can be arguably not worth it, e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42132131 Fair enough if you're stuck behind a CGNAT though.
265.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
This page really just proves my point. I'm glad their conventions at least can be explained , but it's all quite complicated!
266.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Wireguard?
267.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Fair, but it's not like other CPU/GPU manufacturer naming schemes give you that either. At least Apple's scheme clearly tells you e.g. "previous arch but more compute".
268.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
I guarantee you that a quick scan of any of those companies' websites will not equip one with a useful general understanding of the naming scheme they use for their products, in the sense that one can see a product name and immediately
269.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
Well then, it's a good thing I didn't say anywhere that they should be exempt from criticism. Incidentally, it's not something I believe. But I do think they are still doing a much better job at naming than other CPU manufact
270.
▲
by
caconym_
2y ago
This question is trivially answered by visiting Apple's website, which is---to my point---not generally true for their competition. If you have some further point to make, I recommend stating it more clearly so we can avoid wasting tim
More ›