Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
caconym_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
481.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
> I'm saying the "Apple goggles" can so easily fall victim this perception because those qualities are so front-and-center with it. And I'm saying nobody will ultimately give a crap if the tech works as well as Apple
482.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
Well, you do you, but if I were using a headset like this as a laptop replacement I would put it and the keyboard in a backpack. You know, just like how I carry my laptop around today.
483.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
People say this about smartphones, too, and yet adoption is practically universal. If the product is worth using, people will use it, and the social friction will fade. The reason products like Google Glass never moved beyond pariah status
484.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
You can use a Bluetooth keyboard pretty much anywhere you can sit with it on your lap or a table in front of you. One might legitimately worry about looking like a huge dork in public, but for a lot of people I imagine there is a lot of app
485.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
> massive > sweaty > strapped > instead of [...] their family/friends > generated avatars > kids [...] grab my headset, strap it on [...] or just go join them? > cutting myself off from the outside world > half-
486.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
> What about slapping an Apple logo on it and pricing it even further out of reach changes that in your mind? Probably the fact that Apple has an excellent track record of entering nascent consumer electronics markets late (e.g. iPod, iP
487.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
> I'm stunned they're shipping it before solving that problem Are you really? Outside of everybody sitting on the couch watching a movie together, which will be an extremely marginal use case for this thing anyway—are you serio
488.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
> There's nothing that revolutionary here in my opinion. It just looks like a more refined Quest 3 Pretty much the same story as the iphone and apple watch, both of which have been massive hits. If they can actually execute on a sta
489.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
> EAB will cause some accidents and prevents a whole lot more, and that's enough for the insurers. It should be enough for everybody on the road. People always say "don't be a statistic" but we are all part of these s
490.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
Actually, maybe I misunderstood you. I thought you were talking about adaptive cruise but you may have been talking about automatic emergency braking. Interpreting your original comment in that context: AEB only kicks in at a point where m
491.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
On my Honda if a car merges in front of me and is accelerating, it maintains its speed presumably on the assumption that the separation will continue to increase. If a car merges in front and is slower than me, i.e. separation is decreasing
492.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
Not really. At the scale of Rust and Firefox, some level of disagreement within and without the relevant political structure(s) is unavoidable.
493.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
You don't need to "talk anything about morality" to make a statement about it. In fact you flatly dismissed any concept of ownership except the one in which I am the strongest and I own a thing because I took it by force and
494.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
> "Might is right" is extremely bad principle for doing politics. It is actually an absence of principles at all. I mean, it's sort of true, but it's very weird to (as GP did) espouse might-makes-right as a determinan
495.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
> You can’t go back and retroactively show your disapproval over something almost 10 years later and say “hey that shouldn’t have happened!”. Of course you can; it happens all the time. See the GOP's recent dismantling of Roe v. Wad
496.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
N = 1 and all that but the change to elevate blue check accounts actually organically made me stop using Twitter. I respect their right to monetize however they feel is best, but it elevated the most ignorant and illiberal and downright hat
497.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
> But then I thought about how hard it might be to build one that blocked modern 5G/wifi networks. (Can any RF/electrical engineers weigh in?) It's a good question. I would love it if a place like that existed near me, but
498.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
Not sure if this is a real thing or a provocation piece but the concept would be much more interesting to me if it was a "no connectivity cafe", perhaps implemented with some sort of Faraday cage setup. My primary creative output
499.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
No, I don't think we are in full agreement. In the part of my comment after "as you say", I did call out that her reasoning re: the marginal utility of $1M for someone who has $3M vs. ~$0 is (imo) correct, so we do have that
500.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
If you have $3M in the bank then you are already a millionaire and the choice as framed above doesn't make sense anymore. It's not a 70% chance of being a millionaire—it's a 100% chance of being one already with a 70% chanc
501.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
> I've noticed zero difference as a too-frequent daily user. I assumed this was how it would go for me too, but after the change to elevate tweets and replies by blue check accounts I actually stopped using it because now, every tim
502.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
> I think, if you wrote a book, you f---ed up, and it should have been a six-paragraph blog post. pardon my french but this is one of the dumbest fucking things i've ever read which makes complete sense given where it's coming
503.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
A "systematic" change in the meaning of a word or phrase means that someone used it wrong once and enough people followed them in their wrongness that it became the norm. It's reasonable to say that once a new meaning has bee
504.
▲
by
caconym_
3y ago
It's stupid, but so is anybody buying a luxury car in the first place unless they have millions and millions of dollars to burn on stupid shit to satisfy their own vanity and other frivolous tendencies. I have much stronger feelings ab
505.
▲
by
caconym_
4y ago
I think there's some theoretical utility to the concept, but the problem seems to be that the software is so bad kids would actually be better off with pencil and paper and old-timey physical textbooks. 99% of modern consumer softwar
506.
▲
by
caconym_
4y ago
Why bother when the source has previously shown itself to be biased and unreliable? That's what happens when you pretend to be a journalist without applying journalistic standards: people will stop taking you seriously, and with good r
507.
▲
by
caconym_
4y ago
This person has a strange vendetta against SpaceX and has in the past made some extremely doomy predictions that didn't pan out, e.g. that the FAA's environmental review of the BC site was going to end badly for SpaceX. I think t
508.
▲
by
caconym_
4y ago
Are the opportunities in those other cities comparable? I don't know Germany, but usually when I see people saying this about places I do know the answer is a resounding 'no'. So it would seem to be a little more complicated
509.
▲
by
caconym_
4y ago
No more unethical or embarrassing than scraping the web for millions of copyrighted works and selling access to unauthorized derivative works.
510.
▲
by
caconym_
4y ago
https://www.cvedetails.com/version-list/1224/19997/1/Google-...
More ›