byteknight

8 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by byteknight 2y ago

   I appreciate the attempt but the reasoning of "it requires maintenance" is entirely moot. You have to do this regardless. Its just whether or not you publish it open-source. You are still saying, internally, this is good enough fo
2. 32.▲
   by byteknight 2y ago

   You can only hold computers accountable if you can guarantee no outside modification. We still haven't ever successfully had a system that's not "pop-able" that I am aware of.
3. 33.▲
   by byteknight 2y ago

   You took a major leap. No one made any such argument.
4. 34.▲
   by byteknight 2y ago

   Where do you get that? He is postulating the external abstraction you are using has more features than you use. He is saying implement only the parts you use.
5. 35.▲
   by byteknight 2y ago

   You may be unaware, but CCP has far more control over private companies than you might think: https://www.cna.org/our-media/indepth/2024/09/fused-together... This is not America. Your ideas do not apply
6. 36.▲
   by byteknight 2y ago

   Do they move the telescope over the year to account for movement? How is that calculated? Does this change with being closer to planets and their gravitational pull? Asked from a total moron.
7. 37.▲
   by byteknight 2y ago

   And leaves no meaningful result. Without knowing why he gripped the paper it is purely left for interpretation and does not guide to a singular understanding.
8. 38.▲
   by byteknight 2y ago

   this is not one of those scenarios. The answer is clearly not obvious.
9. 39.▲
   by byteknight 2y ago

   While I dont know your scenario as an avid user of both gpt and claude, I would recommend move away from Google style search queries, and begin conversing. The more you give the LLM the more you'll get close to what you want.
10. 40.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    Making these types of choices are done in the interest of the writer and not the reader. Plain and simple. It draws intrigue, sometimes undue. This is one of them. That doesn't make it bad or wrong to do. As a side note, generally, its
11. 41.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    Both yes and no are one syllable. Your drawn out drama-incucing style of writing left a huge hanger that makes it unpleasurable.
12. 42.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    I think there is an inherent weight associated with the intrinsic knowledge opposed to the reasoning steps as intrinsic knowledge can override reasoning. Written out here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42773282
13. 43.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    I believe this comes from our verbiage. If I asked you, "hey. How many Rs in strawberry?". You're going to tell me 2, because the likelihood is I am asking about the ending Rs. That's at least how I'd interpret the
14. 44.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    I may be looking at this too deeply, but I think this suggests that the reasoning is not always utilized when forming the final reply. For example, IMMEDIATELY, upon it's first section of reasoning where it starts counting the letters:
15. 45.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    Disclaimer: I am very well aware this is not a valid test or indicative or anything else. I just thought it was hilarious. When I asked the normal "How many 'r' in strawberry" question, it gets the right answer and argue
16. 46.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    I absolutely love the look. Is it a template or custom?
17. 47.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    I would argue because we can't postulate a means of testing it now does not mean it is thereby impossible to prove; merely currently.
18. 48.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    Now you're intentionally mixing VFX and animation. Animation, at least in my meaning, was more cartoon.
19. 49.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    All you did was make the phrase "makes things up" more palatable. It still means the same thing. He lies.
20. 50.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    Feels like you're looking for a strawman argument, and may have found one. I would retort that animation and real-life-looking video do different things to our psyche. As an uneducated wanna-be intellectual, I would lean toward thinkin
21. 51.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    I feel like a lot of the good that projects like this do get muddied by the overly ambitious claims.
22. 52.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    This was an incredible explanation of the types of issues facing locks. It may not be exhaustive, but it is certainly illuminating the types of issues and potentially unforeseen problems with distributed systems. I loved reading it, thanks.
23. 53.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    Seems logical to me.
24. 54.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    I know some of these words!
25. 55.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    Even though I agree with you, if adding features meant keeping all existing features we'd never progress anywhere.
26. 56.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    I get the argument, but if that is more than a strawman argument to you, I am bewildered. Making a network connection is infinitely less problematic than having root level access to a kernel (translate to windows language for NT)
27. 57.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    Grass is good.
28. 58.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    I forked an android app [1] to share articles to the app, which converts to markdown and then sends to obsidian. I also use a Firefox extension that uses Obsidian extensuion Advanced URI to send markdown versions of articles (with frontmatt
29. 59.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    Firefox containers are amazing
30. 60.▲
    by byteknight 2y ago

    So because you don't understand it, its rumors? A Simple google search would answer all of your questions in a literal sentence. It removes APIs used by ad blockers. https://gprivate.com/6dp1q