buvanshak

11 ms·

61.
by buvanshak 8y ago
So if objects are just perturbation in a field, and field is a mathematical construct, just like the concept of a number, or a line or a circle, then isn't it meaning less to look for a start for the existence of a field, and hence the
62.
by buvanshak 8y ago
What is a field?
63.
by buvanshak 8y ago
I cannot make much sense of your comment. But let me expand on my original comment and tell this. The only charitable work that I consider genuine is the one that you does not know about. When you read about the work of a person 'x&#x2
64.
by buvanshak 8y ago
I for one, will never trust the rich (Especially when it is clear when they pay people to promote their deeds and paint them an angel). I think what ever they do, they do it to gather more wealth (Even if it is not apparent for the common m
65.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>I don't think a proper con-man would go to the trouble of actually launching rockets/building cars/digging tunnels though... Why do you think that? Wouldn't it just give away the fact that he is a fraud? A smart conm
66.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>understand almost everything said... If by 'almost everything', you mean stuff that a non native English speaker could have understood anyway, then yes.
67.
by buvanshak 8y ago
> Its capabilities are about on par with an airplane autopilot. Some one should study you. Because I don't know how someone with a brain can be so stupid...Not considering the possiblity that you are paid for it, because everyone kn
68.
by buvanshak 8y ago
> Looks likes the NHTSA has disavowed Tesla’s interpretation of that study... Wow. This is a story in its own, because that statistics has been touted a million time by the tesla/elon apologists..
69.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>caption over a billion videos in 10 languages on YouTube; Utterly useless. And I don't think it is improving.
70.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Entities like Elon Musk is a symptom of the worsening of the disease of stupidity that has gotten hold of the global human population.... It is not really surprising when our whole system of existence has the stupidity and weakness of its i
71.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Bill Gates (and his shills) can go to hell. No one cares about them assholes.
72.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>how many times they were correct or incorrect in their facts presented in there articles And who decides that?
73.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Saving humanity? Who is saving humanity..?
74.
by buvanshak 8y ago
> Say what but not when and you can't be "wrong" MO of Elon Musk and the likes...
75.
by buvanshak 8y ago
What a stupid article. People should really cut down on trying to turn every single thing (silly ones at times, such as this) into a fallacy and getting a dopamine hit out of it...
76.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>When I try to implement this sort of thing functionally it feels like a retrofit, and never as elegant as the simple imperative "do this, then this, then that". Not sure what you mean by elegance. I am not interested in elegan
77.
by buvanshak 8y ago
> I just don't feel like Haskell fills that requirement.. About readability, Haskell in unreadable until you understand some basic precedence rules really well and until you internalize a hand full of things like function compos
78.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>This gives you the immutability advantages of functional programming without the run-on sentence syntax... What exactly do you mean by this? Have you looked into something like let expression in Haskell? You can define as many symbols a
79.
by buvanshak 8y ago
You compute what pixels on the screen should assume what color so that you may be entertained....I ll show myself out now..
80.
by buvanshak 8y ago
I just water floss now. I don't think any amount of brushing can come near the ability to clean teeth like pressurized water...
81.
by buvanshak 8y ago
But the argument is kind of stupid. It would have made a little sense if she said something like "Cave men didn't ate candy bars" or something like that..
82.
by buvanshak 8y ago
This is the third time this link has been posted in the past three weeks or so. And not only that, every time, it ended up on the front page. Just before that these posts started, there was an article posted that says "Lyme disease is
83.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Care to post the calculations?
84.
by buvanshak 8y ago
> I don't believe that anything short of them or their loved ones contacting measles will change their minds. That is like saying people should not be driving cars since there is someone dying of a car accident every day. And that a
85.
by buvanshak 8y ago
> Antivaccers are particularly difficult because they simply have no faith in science or doctors and believe that any evidence is fabricated. Do you think that is fabricating evidence is not possible? Is the possibility to fabricate evid
86.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>That was more subtle, but again, found relatively quickly. Wait. What? How do you measure "relatively quickly"? As far as I know, we have been using it even after the problems were known....... >The alternative to roundup i
87.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>If e.g. artificial sweeteners caused cancers the way many believe, you'd see people dropping dead left and right, with cancers clearly linkable to the use of sweeteners. Wait a min. I don't remember smokers dropping dead left
88.
by buvanshak 8y ago
Another manifestation I have seen of this behavior is this. The claim "vaccines does not cause autism" is often made to implicitly imply " All vaccines are very safe". I mean, this belief is harbored by every single one
89.
by buvanshak 8y ago
A very good recent example being Vaping replacing smoking as a "healthier alternative"....
90.
by buvanshak 8y ago
>At a certain age, you are vulnerable.. I think if you are in high school, then you should be out of that zone.. > If you don't, you get eliminated but that's life right? Exactly my point To add to this. I think it is a fall

More ›