butlike

24 ms·

691.
by butlike 10mo ago
If it told you how close you were then you could just brute force your way to a perfect score every board by trying each square.
692.
by butlike 10mo ago
You could just package an arbitrary 100 levels, let the player play them in any order, then give rewards for 10, 20, 30, 40, etc. levels completed/mastered.
693.
by butlike 10mo ago
That's why you need to replace your baby's teeth with titanium spikes DAY ONE. They'll thank you tomorrow
694.
by butlike 10mo ago
Idk, my cat's vet measures the cats age based on the plaque on their teeth. Pretty sure my cat's not wealthy and has a tendency to over-eat.
695.
by butlike 10mo ago
Do you use Little Snitch? Sometimes it used to interfere with Airdrop based on my rules, but I can't remember specifics. Definitely a custom rule I set up though
696.
by butlike 10mo ago
I was able to get 13.5 waves/sec, though not consistently.
697.
by butlike 10mo ago
Apophenia is higher in people expressing schizophrenic behavior. You get a lot of "domain crossing" where one tries to relate a particle in space with a grain of sugar in a cake, as a ridiculous example. Hence the math and physics
698.
by butlike 10mo ago
It's a waste of time and energy, and when you're older you'll realize energy is the premium here.
699.
by butlike 10mo ago
Yeah, it shows the AI is not capable of writing maintainable projects. I'm off the fence. And its cool you find it cool, but reducing the problem space to that of a toy project makes it so much less impressive as to be trivially ignora
700.
by butlike 10mo ago
You ask what you learned building the house. The hammer hits the nails.
701.
by butlike 10mo ago
And since it's vibe coded, no one knows what the opcodes are. LLM won't remember. Human has no comments. Human can't trust post-hoc LLM-generated comments because they're poisonous.
702.
by butlike 10mo ago
I disagree it's less work. It just carte blanche rewrites tests. I've seen it rewrite and rewrite tests to the point of undermining the original test intention. So now instead of intentionally writing code and a new unit test, I n
703.
by butlike 10mo ago
idk, why?
704.
by butlike 10mo ago
An LLM gives AN answer. If you ask for not many more than that it gets confused, but instead of acting in a human-like way, it confidently proceeds forward with incorrect answers. You never quite know when the context got poisoned, but reli
705.
by butlike 10mo ago
Probably not because if it affected white neighborhoods, it either wouldn't be enacted, shut down after complaints, or receive enough bad press as to be shut down.
706.
by butlike 10mo ago
Global issues start locally. See: tragedy of the commons
707.
by butlike 10mo ago
If they're authenticated when I install the OS, what makes them illegal?
708.
by butlike 10mo ago
Isn't that all an OS is? A platform to launch apps?
709.
by butlike 10mo ago
So it's now like TextEdit.app running in plaintext mode. Plus one Copilot button evidently. Cool. Everyone's hating on win11, but I'm getting more and more inclined to switch off osx day-by-day. Direct X and gaming is a power
710.
by butlike 10mo ago
You seem like a reasonable person. Good job.
711.
by butlike 10mo ago
Damn, I might be a robot. Hate folding towel laundry
712.
by butlike 10mo ago
I read that as: it's a benefit to empty the payload if you're certain the ship is going to be sunk. Doing that in 60sec. prevents wasted payload or the opportunity for the enemy to recover the munitions. Is that correct, or is it
713.
by butlike 10mo ago
It's nice that the project probably helps cut down on accidentally re-buying already owned books. I would hope the project doesn't remove the joy of randomly rediscovering joyous books in your own collection from time to time.
714.
by butlike 10mo ago
I might argue metaphorically your direct reports can be considered your army. If not an army, then your microcosm of workforce. If you use up the workforce (in whichever way), then you're implicitly "done" as well. I think sa
715.
by butlike 10mo ago
Nicely put and I agree
716.
by butlike 10mo ago
Why is that sad? lol
717.
by butlike 10mo ago
Nicer way: new goal
718.
by butlike 10mo ago
There's no such thing as going all in on one thing. At some point you know how to find food and eat, so no matter how much you've devoted your time to one thing, it won't be the maximum possible amount of time
719.
by butlike 10mo ago
There's no such thing as productivity. Productivity is concocted solutions to manufactured problems.
720.
by butlike 10mo ago
nah, the tasks evolve as you get older. having a senior do all their tasks and whatever else without guidance sounds like free work. even the old people in the old folk's home get an assistant to help them take their pills!

More ›