Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
butlike
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
571.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Syringe out the old paint, syringe in the new paint.
572.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
So pandaman is good and mattmanser is part of the same AI slop disinformation campaign as alexpotato. Got it.
573.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
I just want a hot NSA rep. Is that too much to ask?
574.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
<Falling down the age pit> "IT'S STILL NICE TO GO ANd browse video games in the physical store..... AAAAAAhhhhhhhhhhhhhh......"
575.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Asking for copyrighted material isn't a crime. Producing copyrighted material is. By the way, give me a digital copy of 28 Years Later. Please.
576.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
If I sing a copyrighted song, however absurd it may sound, I CAN, in fact, be sued by the copyright holder.
577.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
I also was skeptical, but musical works makes more sense for that argument. Their premise is still flawed, though
578.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
For #2 yes...you would be engaging in copyright infringement. The library, being on the hook, would probably ask you to stop if they noticed you copying full books. If not the first time, certainly on the second
579.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Still don't understand why we need positive behavioral changes "at scale," but I'm going to leave it at: if it works, I'm happy for you.
580.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Lack of resource adds stress to the body, plain and simple. Exercising without a caloric deficit can build muscle. Weight loss without exercise is all loss no gain while maintaining a stressful state on the body. And "good ol' fas
581.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
GLP-1 drugs, as I understand it, reduce appetite. They don't magically add nutrients to the body. Of course the body will reduce cravings for alcohol, nicotine, and gambling. Nutrients would be prioritized over the poisons such as alco
582.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
I don't agree with the elimination of things. Removing things can be its own source of tribulation. I agree on all other parts, though
583.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Nothing says "I can finally conquer my fears and anything that comes up" like a little strength in your back pocket.
584.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
In addition to that, Google and Apple are demonstrated business partners. Google has consistently paid Apple billions to be the default search engine, so they have demonstrated they pay on time and are a known quantity. Imagine if OpenAI ev
585.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Mad props to the people who throw up a working site, then let it just sit, paying the domain/hosting costs for 20+ years. Mad. Props.
586.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
I waited 4 hours to watch the 3min Phantom Menace trailer when it dropped.
587.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Dial up was 4 (four) kbps. Conceptually preloading wasn't possible I don't think
588.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Just wait until you get to scoring...
589.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
I got 11/18 on architechture, and like 4/18 on food. Thought those would be reversed!
590.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Some of the tests feel like they're trying to trick you. How would you ever know with the nori roll if you weren't there?
591.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
#earthisamoat
592.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
1:29 until you're able to push to the `main` branch. Please enjoy these messages from our sponsors.
593.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
You're touching on the eternal App Store debate. "It's my phone, I should be able to install whatever I want on it!" Which is true, but also hasn't been true since the mid-90s (early 2000s at the latest).
594.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
This bolster's OP's point, to an extent
595.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Not all percentages are weighted equally. That 1% is worth a lot more than the low-hanging 99% from your example
596.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Sounds like a panicking company grasping and clawing for a moat
597.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
First impressions are everything. It's going to be hard to claw back good will without a complete branding change. But... where do you go from 'AI'???
598.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
But they're not optimizing the average worker's productivity. That's a silicon valley talking point. The average worker, IF they use AI, ends up proofreading the text for the same amount of time as it would take to write the
599.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
You don't address Epstein or Madoff in your retort.
600.
▲
by
butlike
8mo ago
Yeah but we're hearing modern strings. It's not the same.
More ›