Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
buremba
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
331.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
They collect user location during the trip, app launches and every possible user action that may be useful for them while you're using the app.
332.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
I wonder if such a tool exists for creating responsive animations from websites as if recording screencasts.
333.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
Actually, you can apply the changes to local files using Chrome's in place editor when you map your local workspace in Devtools. (See the sidebar in Sources tab)
334.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
Dart is a successor to Javascript, not Kotlin.
335.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
We're using Kotlin in our backend and pretty happy about it. It has support for co-routines and great syntax, it's lightweight compared to Scala and IntelliJ plays great with Kotlin (no surprise as both of them are from JetBrains)
336.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
Yet another landing page influenced by Stripe. :)
337.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
Software is eating the world. You can simulate almost all the instruments with software, create patterns easily with basic programming skills and create the music that you want in a cheaper and cleaner way compared to the traditional method
338.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
Welcome to the world of enterprise-ready complex applications. I agree that these cases should be covered by the compiler but man, there are mainstream languages that don't implement generics just because they're complex and pret
339.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
Sounds cool but I can't actually imagine the way you described. :) Any tutorials, articles?
340.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
I wonder how you avoid writing stateful components in real-world complex SPAs.
341.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
A fair comparison would be with JS as all the other alternatives use JS.
342.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
The article doesn't seem to explain specifically why RN didn't work for them but I believe that the real pain for them is to organize 100 engineers to work on the same project. Often they were confused about native vs RN approach
343.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
Flutter's approach is more like "similar UI and UX in all platforms" so I don't think that you need to write native code that much compared to RN. Also, it uses Dart seems to be a better fit for them compared to JS (stat
344.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
Give Kotlin a shot. It has Swift-like syntax and feature-set, you can also call Java libraries from Kotlin since it's all in JVM.
345.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
"We applaud GitHub on its accomplishments and congratulate Microsoft on its acquisition. While we admire what's been done, our strategy differs in two key areas. First, instead of integrating multiple tools together, we believe a
346.
▲
by
buremba
8y ago
I'm not in our target customer audience but here is my take: 1. You should probably work on the landing page and try to make it look like an enterprise product. 2. Your target audience is obviously enterprise companies so you should pr
347.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
Sounds fair. I'm convinced to try out their service, it's good to see that they also added pricing to their website. Let's see how it's better compared to Presto as they have the similar use-case.
348.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
What's the focused offering provided by them? Does their system more scalable, efficient or cheap or is there any technical limitations of the AWS products? Personally, I don't think $500M matters if their customers (I'm assu
349.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
The motivation is rather different. If you ask Redshift users, the motivation is mostly that they're already using AWS and depend on their services. That's the case for GCP as well, I would love to hear from the Google side of the
350.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
Yes, they have their own query engine but the idea is same; separate storage and query layer, scale the query layer on demand and charge for it. I like their approach but not everyone is willing to depend on a third party company for their
351.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
Our system is also near-realtime. The default batch duration is 3 minutes, it's also configurable but it will also affect the background processes (shard compaction, data organization jobs etc.) so our customers usually prefer 5 minute
352.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
BigQuery charges you for the storage so it's not just the queries. It also charges for the streaming inserts which is also not that cheap for large volumes of data. I might be biased since I'm running an analytics company and this
353.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
If you're pre-calculating the metrics and dropping the raw data from your systems, you can't actually get the benefits of the ad-hoc systems. You can't ask a new question to your existing analytics data and you need to do cus
354.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
Sounds like they over-engineered the solution. If you have ad-hoc use-case, BigQuery is great but it's quite expensive. If you just need to pre-calculate the metrics using SQL, Athena / Prestodb / Clickhouse / Redshift S
355.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
> DNS resolvers inherently can't use a catchy domain because they are what have to be queried in order to figure out the IP address of a domain. It's a chicken and egg problem. And, if we wanted the service to be of help in tim
356.
▲
Ask HN: Analytics UI for event data in your data warehouse
3 points
by
buremba
9y ago
|
0 comments
357.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
You can still play with the color scheme and typography to make it seem like native on iOS. (gray in iOS and blue in Android). Personally, I think that this is more convenient considering the UI will be more consistent and the development c
358.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
Don't look too far, Django is still the most flexible and stable solution (If you're familiar with Python) for CRUD unless you need a single page application (SPA).
359.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
We have a product in analytics space and our target customer audience was companies that want to develop an analytics solution on top of AWS. We're not actually a direct competitor to AWS but it turns out to be that way. At first, we t
360.
▲
by
buremba
9y ago
Is it in-memory? Does it support replication or sharding? What's the main use-case? How does it differ from ORC, Parquet or Arrow? The repository doesn't have any information.
More ›