bureaucrat

11 ms·

31.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
Are PG and VG ok? What’s the difference that makes Vit E acetate harmful?
32.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
It’s still superior.
33.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
This attack was done by North Koreans. The site is a North Korean propaganda advertising site, which is visited a lot by South Korean researchers.
34.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
CVE no. was created in July. I wonder whether the fix took that long.
35.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
No, I favor full screen screenshots because people tend to not include important things when they crop.
36.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
Yeah, this is the reason why I don’t donate even a cent to charities that ‘claims’ to help Africans and North Koreans. I’d rather give a dollar to the local homeless shelter and watch them burn fuel with it at night, than my cent going stra
37.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
Don’t worry. You won’t get a subpoena or get a surprise visit from you-know-what. Tor relays just relays data, while exit nodes relay data from tor to Internet.
38.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
They _were_ also not disclosing that they were hacked last year. https://web.archive.org/web/20180504001844/https://8ch.net/b... Yes, people would rather give their entire packet to a hacker than fi
39.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
Tor asks not to host on them so no.
40.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
What datacenter do you use? How much does it cost? Did you get any legal troubles?
41.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
I run 3 nodes. They have 1TB traffic cap per month, so they serve 30GB per day per node, and then hibernates. It costs 15$ per month to run. I also use those nodes for personal use, so it’s not that expensive. Also I’ve convinced my company
42.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
I’d rather trust Google than Brave.
43.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
Nothing wrong.
44.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
I know. Problem with extensions is they tend to break with version upgrades. The fundamental question is: why not implement this stupid feature in the first place?
45.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
People opened tickets on bugzilla. They have even developed an extension. (which seems to break on every major version upgrade) It’s even not that hard to implement, it’s just they are valuing their stupid politics and philosophy over user
46.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
If a DNA is found on a felony crime site, I think all searches should be possible. If possible restrict it with a need for a warrant. I’m trying to think but so far there seems no way to justify limiting searches.
47.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
Yeah, your suggestion sounds good. But remember: What tor is doing is hard. They are doing complex crypto, networking, security.... The hard stuff. The real stuff. Torproject is a nonprofit organization with limited capabilities. They are d
48.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
It seems that they changed the name from hidden service to onion service.
49.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
Simple. Imagine you are using tor and one of the relay has problems(unstable, high latency or packet loss). You don’t know which of the 3 hops failed. We have no option but to build a new circuit and we don’t want that. That’s why tor need
50.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
They tried to enforce users to become a relay when using as a client but relays should be stable servers so the plan was dismissed.
51.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
First of all, it’s hidden sevices, not dark web. Second, to anyone crawling hidden services or crawling over tor, please run a relay or decrease your hop. Don’t sacrifice other’s desperate need for anonymity for your $whatever_purpose_thats
52.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
A silicon atom is 0.2nm.
53.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
No, New York Times. If you don’t allow private mode browsing, I won’t consume your contents. Maybe respect others privacy before using the ‘democracy and freedom is at stake’ rhetoric.
54.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
Why should legit users need to check whether a packet is to a dns server or not? And blocking https packets with mere confidence is impossible.
55.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
Oh no no no, it does add security. Think DNS over TLS. Okay. You think $ip:$port is a dns connection. You send query with DoT protocol. You get answers. Bingo! It’s DNS. If it’s DNS over HTTPS, you can’t tell. What domain(dns.quad9.net or c
56.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
“You” need to run port 443 DNS server. Instead we can make this mandatory for everyone. Your explained method is nearly impossible to implement for medium to large scale networks.
57.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
It sounds bad, but the fact that it can’t be blocked is important in terms of censorship. DNS over TLS can be easily blocked by blocking port 853. To block DNS over HTTPS you need to block the entire HTTPS traffic.
58.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
DoH should be supported on the OS network stack, if needed. I can’t understand this move. Firefox should retreat from this default.
59.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
I have. It just doesn’t get the ‘f*ing job done’ unlike Mac or Windows. Don’t get me wrong, I use Linux extensively. I spend nearly half of my computer time on a SSH terminal. I just hate the graphical part of it.
60.
by bureaucrat 7y ago
And what ‘worth’, may I ask, did you get?

More ›