Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bumby
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
841.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
Thanks, I was only going off the nutrition label, it shows 60% RDA per sheet. However, the reference link for the academy is broken; I wonder if they’ve changed their stance? Other references indicate raw nori has B12 but the drying process
842.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
a lot of the cost is in testing and certifying This is a fact that is often overlooked in these types of forums. Quality control is an enormous expense for high reliability systems. A bolt doesn’t necessarily cost $1k because it took a lo
843.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
> I use supplements for B12 which is missing from vegetable foods. Just in case you're looking for an inexpensive vegan whole food source, seaweed sheets (like those used in sushi) have a relatively high amount of B12. I took a loo
844.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
It's prevalent all over the aerospace industry. It's also why the Columbia was lost (foam shedding happens but it's "in family" ie - it's a known issue that hasn't prevented a flight from being successfu
845.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
> couldn't guarantee that the O-ring would perform properly. Small nit, but from a reliability perspective you can almost never guarantee something will work. It's a probability distribution but, to your point, you need dece
846.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
> Are you still advocating designing a whole new airframe instead? That would be the ideal solution for that hazard. But I can’t say if it’s the best risk profile overall. I would settle for a properly implemented engineered mitigation
847.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
>designing an entirely new airplane would have been: 1. an absolutely enormous cost, like a couple orders of magnitude more 2. several years of delay 3. pilots would have to be completely retrained Yes, this is the same case I was maki
848.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
"Boeing" is not a cause. Things like their safety culture can be a cause, or lack of good process control can be a cause. The reason why Boeing is catching a lot of flack is because they deviated substantially from best practices.
849.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
I disagree. The media has covered the training (or lack of it) extensively. It seems like you want to point to a singular cause. As with most mishaps with complex systems, it’s the result of a cascade of failures. Training is only one part
850.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
As an example, you said they “ignored” the over-speed warning. I would bet it’s much more likely that there was too much going on in the cockpit, likely with confusing or conflicting information, that prevented them from making the correct
851.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
This comment seems to ignore all kinds of good practices in human factors engineering that are prevalent in aerospace.
852.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
Importantly here, Boeing doesn’t require licensed engineers because they operate under an industrial exemption.
853.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
Mark Forkner was a pilot charged in the MCAS debacle (and acquitted).
854.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
You can also read the Boeing documents. The hazard analysis listed MCAS as hazardous. By Boeing process controls, that should have mandated redundant sensors. Why were they optional? Because that could increase profits. (Seattle Times has
855.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
Ehhhh it’s not always the case. Lots of laws have low levels of support (from constituents) but high levels of inertia that prevents them from being repealed. Subsidies are a prime examples. Alpaca subsidies for the Korean War were not repe
856.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
For a relatively brief period, I worked as a software quality engineer related to aerospace research and development. Practically every test that used software required a “go/nogo” decision before they were allowed to run any safety cr
857.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
When you avoid accountablilty, you pervert the risk/benefit. So people get incentivized to roll the dice on low-risk/high severity events because most of the time, it will come out in their favor and they can continue cashing thei
858.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
They aren’t in these industries. Relatively low-level engineers have the capability (some would say duty) to stop work. Typically, they have a different chain of command for that very reason.
859.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
Yeah we both agree that the decision isn’t “kill/not kill”. It’s much more ambiguous and murky, especially when dealing with low probability events. That’s why it takes expertise, but it doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be accountability f
860.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
Not to "kill their users" but they realistically have meeting to vote on whether the system is "go/nogo". This is the basic structure of many aerospace designs. If you ever watch a rocket launch, they are literally
861.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
> It’s as if in your mind one engineer makes the singular call and sees the entire picture of the project and its risks. To a certain extent this is true. To extend the OP's example, a mechanical or civil engineer who stamps a buil
862.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
Professionally licensed engineers are required to take an oath to protect the public. What many don't realize is that manufacturers like Boeing operate under a licensing exemption, on the assumption that business and manufacturing proc
863.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
In the US, sometimes the court may “pierce the corporate veil” when actions are particularly egregious or unlawful and hold the shareholders or directors personally liable. Rather than go into all the specifics of law (since I'm not a
864.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
Combat troops, and especially SOCOM, have lower rates of PTSD than other troops. That data doesn’t seem to align with your guilt hypothesis.
865.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
NFL fans don’t want to watch flag football, generally
866.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
This is discussed in the article, the mechanism is thought to be different: > It was not chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or C.T.E., which is found in football players and other athletes who have been repeatedly hit in the head. It was
867.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
> soldiers with the same set of symptoms that remained married. The SEAL in the article was married at the time of his death.
868.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
From the article, they have objective evidence from studying the brains of deceased servicemembers: "It was not chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or C.T.E., which is found in football players and other athletes who have been repeatedl
869.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
The article links to a USSOCOM-funded study. In your opinion, are they (as a whole) seriously concerned with mitigating this issue or is it just checking the box? The worry is this can be similar to the buried diesel tank issue contaminatin
870.
▲
by
bumby
2y ago
> Instead, put a QR code. Please, no. Tech is not the solution to everything. Every time you put an additional layer between the consumer and information, and more prone to breaking. Software tech is notoriously unreliable in the consum
More ›