Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bulbosaur123
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
52 ms
·
61.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
> From a calculator you do not expect "«pretty»" reliable, but just reliable. From a human you expect faulty computation because of the economization of resources, but you know it can reason. Just have it use Wolfram Alpha plug
62.
▲
A CERN for Open Source Large-Scale AI Research and Its Safety
(openpetition.eu)
2 points
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
|
0 comments
63.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
How is censorship resistance and unconfiscateability not a legitimate service?
64.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
How much of stock's value is backed up by company's property and how much of that % is pure speculation?
65.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
Good luck using fiat with that.
66.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
> The European Parliament wants to limit the amount you can deposit to a private wallet. What? Source. How do they plan on enforcing this?
67.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
> They’re a shady crypto exchange (is there any other kind?) Yes. Bitstamp.
68.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
Born Free
69.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
Confiscation resistance is not useful?
70.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
How can you give human rights to an entity that isn't human?
71.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
Why "we" need to decide? Can't GPT figure it out for us?
72.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
Funny, but I actually discussed this with my therapist. He asked me where he can try out the AI shrink and was impressed by it. He's on board!
73.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
World is way better WITH internet than it would have been without it. Hackers and scammers are just price to pay.
74.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
The risk is there. But it's worth the risk. Humans are curious creatures, you can't just shut something like this in a box. Even if it is dangerous, even if it has potential to destroy humanity. It's our nature to explore, it
75.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
False equivalence. Sea level raise is unequivocally harmful. While everyone getting Einstein in a pocket is damn awesome and incredibly useful. How can this be bad?
76.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
> Omg you should see a therapist. How do you know I'm not already?
77.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
> Why? Because it's the natural evolution. It has to be. It is written.
78.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
Ultimate destruction from AGI is inevitable anyway, so why not accelerate it and just get it over with? I applaud releasing these tools to public no matter how dangerous they are. If it's not meant for humanity to survive, so be it. At
79.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
ControlNet has entered the chat.
80.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
So connect GPT4 with calculator using LangChain, problem solved!
81.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
I was addressing about subjects who obsess about surgeries. They are absolutely correct that looks matter big time and that they act as an amplifier of sorts (studies prove good looking people get treated better, have better career options,
82.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
> it is all about pathological narcissism I don't think so. I think it's just about biological need to secure a suitable mate. Men are convinced (not entirely without basis) that you need to be hyper-competitive this day and a
83.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
Disgusting clickbait title. You could say this about any surgery.
84.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
Unfortunate in short term, but beneficial in long term.
85.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
Was it GPT4 or GPT3.5? It spews less bullshit with each new iteration. Matter of time really.
86.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
How does this compare to Automatic1111?
87.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
Only initial cancer or mets as well? When can this be realistically tested on real humans? How long? I have a close relative with potential biochemical recurrence. Could this save him?
88.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
> LLMs aren’t reasoning about the puzzle. They’re predicting the most likely text to print out, based on the input and the model/training data. Just like you.
89.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
> It's not thinking, it's simply generating text. Just like you.
90.
▲
by
bulbosaur123
4y ago
It's just an autocomplete. It just tells you what you want to hear. That is how it's been trained. If you want it to tell you awful shit, it will do so.
More ›