buisi

13 ms·

91.
by buisi 6y ago
Child porn carries very steep mandatory minimums. It is common for defendants to settle for a plea deal under the minimum.
92.
by buisi 6y ago
NCMEC is the U.S. hotline. IWF is the British hotline. They exchange information with each other and pass information through to law enforcement after reviewing it. Different hotlines may differ in what reports they're willing to take
93.
by buisi 6y ago
I don't know. Possible duplicate post?
94.
by buisi 6y ago
I welcome a title change. False is equally good at articulating the subject. There is a specific case of deliberately fraudulent reports mentioned in the article. Or highly likely to be such. An individual who makes thousands of false repor
95.
by buisi 6y ago
To avoid running afoul of the Fourth Amendment but a court ruled NCMEC a government entity in the end.
96.
by buisi 6y ago
Another theory goes that people who attack children would have done it either way. You punish the innocent for the crimes of someone else.
97.
by buisi 6y ago
Public outrage. Legality in some jurisdictions. Chance of employees getting harassed.
98.
Child sexual abuse material could be going undetected because of ‘false reports’(iwf.org.uk)
75 points by buisi 6y ago|130 comments
99.
by buisi 7y ago
It is worse than that. In one case, the Australian Police kept a site up for an entire year (the site is said to have had as many as million accounts, although account numbers often don't map precisely to actual people) to try to colle
100.
by buisi 7y ago
> This idea is laughable. Do you honestly believe just not telling the victims the material is out there will convince them the material isn't out there? I'm not really agreeing or disagreeing with your viewpoints, but your log
101.
by buisi 7y ago
That isn't quite the case, it is more so due to negative attention in the media from child killers and the like. Most of it actually tends to be thirty year old magazines, nudes and things the minors (perhaps foolishly) upload themselv