bucaran

13 ms·

31.
by bucaran 11y ago
I had heard of this, then forgot about it and now you reminded me of it again. Eshell looks amazing.
32.
by bucaran 11y ago
So, to answer the most important question, WHY do I want this thing? Long wall of text ahead, but I promise this covers a lot. --- If you are only using fish, you are missing out the ability to effectively share plugins, prompts, configs, m
33.
by bucaran 11y ago
Everything is available. Not just plugins, but anything that runs in "fish". Well, that's the promise and the pledge. This includes whatever is the OMF barracks, and also Wahoo <github.com/wa>. If you know anythi
34.
Show HN: Fisherman – Plugin manager and CLI toolkit for fish shell(fisherman.sh)
39 points by bucaran 11y ago|7 comments
35.
Show HN: Getopts(1)-like CLI parser for fish-shell(github.com)
2 points by bucaran 11y ago|0 comments
36.
Show HN: Scaffold out a node module with ES6+, Babel, tape and npm scripts(github.com)
2 points by bucaran 11y ago|0 comments
37.
Show HN: Sharklines on you terminal(github.com)
2 points by bucaran 11y ago|0 comments
38.
by bucaran 11y ago
The problem with OMF is that it is entirely based in an earlier work of mine Wahoo, which I put together over a weekend and while it improved over the very original oh-my-zsh clone, it was not very good. See the merge commit here: * https:
39.
by bucaran 11y ago
The relevant link is here ( https://github.com/fish-shell/fish-shell/blob/master/share/t... ) ridiculous_fish, we still use `complete` all over the place for completions don't we. In Fisherman th
40.
by bucaran 11y ago
I hope to make that easier with Fisherman. You can install any "package" or snippet if you have an URL. There is also the Fisherman Index with packages you can get by their name. Sorry, but I like this one https://githu
41.
by bucaran 11y ago
npm 4 dep management is more complex. In fish there is no private function scope so things are much simpler (but not as powerful indeed).
42.
by bucaran 11y ago
Thanks for the question. I needed a term that would fit the README without sounding too extravagant either. Here is the explanation from fisher(7) [ https://github.com/fisherman/fisherman/blob/master/man&#
43.
by bucaran 11y ago
Fisherman is a shell manager for fish that lets you share and reuse code, prompts and configurations easily. This tool is not a framework, it does not pollute your shell public scope with superfluous functions, it does not make your shell s
44.
Show HN: Fisherman – Fish Shell Manager(github.com)
13 points by bucaran 11y ago|12 comments
45.
A robust shell manager for fish
1 points by bucaran 11y ago|2 comments
46.
Fishtape: Test your fish-shell scripts(github.com)
26 points by bucaran 11y ago|0 comments
47.
TAP producer and test harness for fishshell(github.com)
2 points by bucaran 11y ago|0 comments
48.
by bucaran 11y ago
We decided to reconcile and end the litigation amicably adding an AUTHORS file and the following copyright: * Copyright (c) 2015 Oh My Fish!
49.
by bucaran 11y ago
Creator of Wahoo here. It's correct. I was one of the owners at omf, meaning I could delete, transfer or rename the repo.
50.
by bucaran 11y ago
No, they did not. The copyright was changed from my name to "Bruno Ferreira Pinto".
51.
Node Callback Heaven(github.com)
3 points by bucaran 11y ago|0 comments
52.
Learn es6 with parsec a cli parser in 50 loc(github.com)
1 points by bucaran 11y ago|0 comments
53.
by bucaran 11y ago
Link: https://github.com/bucaran/parsec Long time `minimist` user here. Leanest and simplest of the pack at just 200 LOC with _no_ dependencies by the legendary substack. Unfortunately the documentation is scarce, it h
54.
Unix compliant arg parser for Node.js (https://github.com/bucaran/parsec)
2 points by bucaran 11y ago|1 comments
55.
by bucaran 11y ago
And the CPU https://github.com/bucaran/nu
56.
Mu – 10-bit JavaScript Computer(github.com)
3 points by bucaran 11y ago|1 comments
57.
Flyjs 0.4.0 full test coverage, plugins in es6/7 ootb, windows(github.com)
1 points by bucaran 11y ago|0 comments
58.
Fly – A modern build system for Node(github.com)
1 points by bucaran 11y ago|0 comments
59.
by bucaran 11y ago
Because shell scripts are more complex to write. I, myself, having used grunt and then switched to gulp, ended up favoring shell scripts / npm scripts, only to realize gets much more complex for larger projects. I think a build system
60.
by bucaran 11y ago
Innovation fosters more innovation. We are trying to improve status quo. Even if this initiative fails, it may spark the right idea on the next person. Fly tasks are co-routine-wrapped generators, so you get modern async flow inside your ta

More ›