buboard

173 ms·

1. 2041.▲
   by buboard 7y ago

   I keep reading about that real estate company - make up your minds is it a tech company or not?
2. 2042.▲
   by buboard 7y ago

   We have always had email servers. You can set up one today. What we need is to to convince more technical people to use the internet the way it was designed for. And to find ways for these people to make money, because the monopolized inte
3. 2043.▲
   by buboard 7y ago

   > offers much more opportunities to create and collaborate than any other time in the past. We had skype, games, ICQ, MSN, blogs, blog aggregators, rss readers, galleries, audiogalaxy, guestbooks, forums, hotline communications, IRC, vid
4. 2044.▲
   by buboard 7y ago

   Ouch. Lets see what they have to say about the cosmetics industry ...
5. 2045.▲
   by buboard 7y ago

   This is the issue with science journalism: this should not be news - not yet. They should keep working with colleagues and report when the human trials are underway. It doesnt help the general public that these preliminary data are out , an
6. 2046.▲
   by buboard 7y ago

   I m sure psychiatry has already answers to the last question And if i m detectably on the spectrum- yes i would! Not because i hate myself, but to experience the other side. I m kinda surprised that people say no - do they also say no to a
7. 2047.▲
   by buboard 7y ago

   “Except this one!”
8. 2048.▲
   by buboard 7y ago

   a $20/mo old server from hetzner gives you unlimited 1Gbps - thats 324TB /mo
9. 2049.▲
   by buboard 7y ago

   you watched a survival documentary, not real life
10. 2050.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    But what did the reviewers say about the paper? ( http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07068 ) They used a normal distribution for "Talent", but that's false. There is plenty of evidence that , like everything in lif
11. 2051.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    Which is kind of surprising, considering that, even though facebook gets all the bad press, Trump's megaphone is actually Twitter.
12. 2052.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    I like a blog that looks like a blog
13. 2053.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    That reaction is the entire point of the article.
14. 2054.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    Hillary attacks Gabbard, Bloomberg (himself a candidate-candidate) attacks Buttigieg, Yang apparently didnt have much chance anyway ... who s left to smear so that the biden-warren fake race is complete?
15. 2055.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    To a for-profit platform? Monetization potential. The most important criterion is how to make money in the platform, fast, before it turns to another walled garden you 're chained into.
16. 2056.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    It does! But adblockers work in google's favor here: they make it impossible for competing ad agencies to grow Google doesn't have an awesome ads platform at this time. They just have no competition
17. 2057.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    smart money would pay them to write negative reviews for your competitors
18. 2058.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    Usually it's about control. Want a new feature that you could perfectly have if you had buttons to fiddle with? You re now gonna have to beg the programmers to do your bidding. Programmers used to serve their audience now it's the
19. 2059.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    Ctrl-F "Interest rates" not found. That's what's different. Where is money going to go if not in the most hopeful investments, in bank accounts? If there is a bubble it's the fault of central banks
20. 2060.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    I mean, you can't be sure they're lying. Odds are nonzero that 38 ppl were looking at that flight
21. 2061.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    not CS-related academia for me. But yeah academia requires a lot more politics, networking etc nowadays in the way that the "industry" doesnt
22. 2062.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    no issue. i m all for letting people (and the market) judge them. But people are calling for regulation because apparently it 's too "free speech"
23. 2063.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    Sure, but , i mean they are free to call it free speech, and use it as a selling point. People judge the truth of that statement by their actions
24. 2064.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    the self-preservation instict of states would dictate that they will limit them when they threaten the power of the government.
25. 2065.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    people are of course not entitled to it, but, if it didnt have anything to do with free speech, would people want to censor it?
26. 2066.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    because the people advocating for tits equality are a tiny group, while mainstream politics have wide implications. I m all for tit freedom, but facebook's lawyers have to weigh in the costs of litigation
27. 2067.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    Would Trump even have a platform if it wasnt for twitter & FB?
28. 2068.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    > You're not entitled to a platform for shouting out loud You voluntarily subscribe on social media though. Nobody is forcing you to hear their noise
29. 2069.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    nobody says they re not. They wouldn't be able to advertise their free speech though
30. 2070.▲
    by buboard 7y ago

    Fair. Though that has more to do with potentially being illegal. The more serious (violation of free speech) thing is political censorship