bubaumba

8 ms·

61.
by bubaumba 2y ago
> What about the dozens (at this point hundreds) of phone models that are both rainproof and have a replaceable battery If that's what you are looking for just get one. It may come even with spyware preinstalled. Then try it underwa
62.
by bubaumba 2y ago
there should be an audio socket hidden somewhere, you can open it by drilling a hole.... (old joke)
63.
by bubaumba 2y ago
yes, when it's possible. but guis may not exist or may be not better than console, like in case of ffmpeg. the best, of course, is smart assistant who can take verbal commands. either human or llm. but my post was about doing complex t
64.
by bubaumba 2y ago
there are ways to minimize memorization, most important: 1. keep log, docs, records of whatever you are doing. most commands are repetitive. 2. copilot or chatgpt, they help a lot with command lines and simple utilities 3. amazon Q sucks in
65.
by bubaumba 2y ago
I think it's possible do to it all on raspberry pico. Having pico doing low level driving and javascript in browser taking high level, feeding pico and providing UI. That would be close to perfect solution
66.
by bubaumba 2y ago
there should be some strict requirements, proprietary video drivers can ruin it all, my guess.
67.
by bubaumba 2y ago
I played with it years ago, but it's still alive and well http://linuxcnc.org/ These days not sure, hard to find computer with parallel port. Combined version with microcontroller like raspberry pico (which cost
68.
by bubaumba 2y ago
if israelis can do it it's most likely not limited to hezbollah. will this be investigated or it will be like nord stream?
69.
by bubaumba 2y ago
> I’m not clear on the virtues or potential of a model like this over a pure text model you can't put pure text with keyboard on a robot. it will become a wheeled computer. actually this is a cool thing as a companion / assista
70.
by bubaumba 2y ago
> For sure, once the LLM hype diminishes It haven't even started. There are so many places it can be used, expect sci-fi in the next few years. There is no way back. The only thing that may change is the AI technology under the hood
71.
by bubaumba 2y ago
That was intentional. And intentionally quite a lot of safe thing can be broken.
72.
by bubaumba 2y ago
> Building software was very costly and hard 30 years ago. Things get cheaper and simpler with time No, it's just as complex as it was 30, 50 years ago. Because complexity is limited by developers' brains. As there was no notic
73.
by bubaumba 2y ago
China is the major second super power. Having only one taken over by 'you know whom' would turn the whole world into a big sh*thole.
74.
by bubaumba 2y ago
If you go to Russia you'll hear the same about rotting Europe and USA. If you bother checking old news it was going on for more than hundred years. Imperialists are still alive, so will be China, don't worry. But, if it will be a
75.
by bubaumba 2y ago
You were right, "Built using ...". It's a commercial project. Must be hard to lift such things off the ground.
76.
by bubaumba 2y ago
> nice reminder that open models are useful to You didn't say open _what_ models. Was that intentional?
77.
by bubaumba 2y ago
may be search it's faster, but this thing is supposed to do it something like fortran and console. ;)
78.
by bubaumba 2y ago
one idea is obvious: multi-model approach. it partially done today for safety checks. the same can be done for correctness. one model produces result, different model only checks the correctness. optionally several results, second model che
79.
by bubaumba 2y ago
> We can be mostly confident that the compiler will generate correct machine code based on correct source code. Recently got email about gcc 14.2, they fixed some bugs in it. Can we trust it now, these could be the last bugs. But before