Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bryan_w
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
bryan_w
4mo ago
It's crazy how people in this thread wanted to physically cause harm to this city's councilmen when it does seem pretty believable that "nobody at the office knew why they had the land or any stipulations attached to it"
32.
▲
by
bryan_w
4mo ago
The state requires things sold to meet a bare minimum of safety. Cars sold require seat belts, movies/games sold require ratings. Devices sold have a meaningful parental controls flow.
33.
▲
by
bryan_w
4mo ago
> it's not intuitive that allowing malicious-site.com to access your Bluetooth keyboard might give that site access to your stored passwords, give them the ability to hijack your DNS settings, or allow them to encrypt your hard driv
34.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
You didn't even mention the "infrasound" issue that's been picking up steam lately
35.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
> Lazy cynicism is itself a form of corruption of one's own mind I love this way of thinking. I might use this quote down the road
36.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
Let's play this out: how do you determine individual clients? By ip? By seasionid?
37.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
But that's not a specification
38.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
People on this site don't really think deeply about what they type. They just say whatever is the most cynical in order to farm up votes
39.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
> Children will just lie Not if the parents are setting it up beforehand (like with small children) then their iaccount or Google account will be under parental controls from that point on. It seems reasonable that if a parent enables th
40.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
I wonder who's in common there?
41.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
Not keeping the door open while grabbing luggage is NPC behavior no matter if it's waymo, Uber or a taxi. The fact he mad this mistake, then went to the news media to broadcast his bad decision making is embarrassing. I bet he finds hi
42.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
I'm pretty sure most people would see Toms point as valid? If Bob made a huge deal about company's abuse of fluffy animal and never otherwise talked about fluffy animal, that would seen as inauthentic
43.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
That was created by AI. Ai is great at playing six degrees of Kevin Bacon
44.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
None of this is true. The fact that there are many, many companies out here today that are doing exactly what you are claiming for the non-CA age verification laws (like in TN and TX), yet you went down the conspiracy route for Meta and Goo
45.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
Enjoying a succulent meal, I guess
46.
▲
by
bryan_w
5mo ago
Nobody needs to be hard on the internet
47.
▲
by
bryan_w
6mo ago
Just use Tor browser? You can turn the tor part off if you need the speed. What you want exists, have at it
48.
▲
by
bryan_w
6mo ago
Sounds like you need a cyberdeck
49.
▲
by
bryan_w
6mo ago
If they turn off the internet, that gives you more time to meet your neighbors and do "arts and crafts" and read (cook)books. He's getting so old, at some point the horse throws him off
50.
▲
by
bryan_w
6mo ago
I have a copy of the weights on my HD and to my knowledge, it hasn't spontaneously went out and acquired web hosting and stood up a web site. That doesn't seem to be something any AI company says is currently possible. If things c
51.
▲
by
bryan_w
6mo ago
You know you can just use a different picture app?
52.
▲
by
bryan_w
6mo ago
Can we trust them to not build the data center anyways? If you think companies always get their way, then a ban is useless, as they will just do it anyways. If on the other hand, believe in the rule of law, then creating a good airtight law
53.
▲
by
bryan_w
6mo ago
I'm pretty sure you're thinking of tuberculosis, not social media
54.
▲
by
bryan_w
6mo ago
Can't set local proxy because of parental controls, can't setup cloud proxy because of ... Being a kid.
55.
▲
by
bryan_w
6mo ago
But it's not a significant amount, compared to other uses in a city. You know this, right?
56.
▲
by
bryan_w
6mo ago
Be careful, you open yourselves up to be used by companies like iDenfy, AgeChecker.Net, IDscan.net, and others as they would HATE to see a local-first solution like what's been proposed in CA and IL to take hold. They want to kill thos
57.
▲
by
bryan_w
6mo ago
> How much personal responsibility should we expect children to have? This is what parents are for.
58.
▲
by
bryan_w
7mo ago
Do you think Meta wouldn't want to be legally mandated to ask for your id? The improvement to ad targeting alone would be enough to pay for any lost users. They would probably want nothing more than to be in the same business as idema
59.
▲
by
bryan_w
7mo ago
You want people to be kicked off the internet because they have a baby face? You think the law should mandate the use of an imperfect facial recognition system?
60.
▲
by
bryan_w
7mo ago
The problem is knowing before today how to handle the case where a ground vehicle isn't across the runway in those 30 seconds.
More ›