Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bryan0
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
bryan0
5mo ago
I agree, vibe coding does not have quality gate checks at each stage, while agentic engineering does. Dev teams get into trouble when they try build to build without a proper process of design, tests, and reviews. This was true before agent
92.
▲
Under the canopy of drone nets covering Ukraine's frontlines
(reuters.com)
4 points
by
bryan0
5mo ago
|
0 comments
93.
▲
8647 Is a Prime Number
(numberempire.com)
23 points
by
bryan0
5mo ago
|
6 comments
94.
▲
by
bryan0
5mo ago
Please explain how this tactic relates here. In this case we have the AI companies saying this technology is potentially very harmful, in fact existential. This seems the complete opposite of what big tobacco did. What I meant by > Peopl
95.
▲
by
bryan0
5mo ago
One of the points I was trying to make is that the statement: > trying to coerce people into using your product out of fear is nonsense. Everyone agrees that there are legitimate reasons to be fearful of this technology, this is not a fa
96.
▲
Chinese Robots Are Flooding America. I Brought One Home [video]
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
bryan0
5mo ago
|
0 comments
97.
▲
by
bryan0
5mo ago
> Why do AI companies want us to be afraid of them? ... According to critics, it benefits AI companies to keep you fixated on apocalypse because it distracts from the very real damage they're already doing to the world. People seem
98.
▲
by
bryan0
5mo ago
I agree with you completely up until this line: > The agent cannot learn from its mistakes. If feedback from this incident is in its context window, it is highly unlikely to make this same mistake again. Yes this is only probabilistic, b
99.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
I see a lot of people struggling to work with agents. This post has a good example: > “you can’t be serious — is this how you fix things? just WORKAROUNDS????” If this is how you’re interacting with your agents I think you’re in for a wo
100.
▲
Diverse organic molecules on Mars revealed by the first SAM TMAH experiment
(nature.com)
2 points
by
bryan0
6mo ago
|
0 comments
101.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
Yes memory is a key part. I’m using sqlite and markdown files. Sqlite is so it can easily search its conversation and thoughts by time and full text search. I actually always put the last 5 hours of so I’d conversation into the context. Mar
102.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
Of course, you need to be careful about what access you give to your agent. I gave my agent its own email, and I can forward it emails if I need it to read anything in my inbox. Everyone will have their own threshold for what type of access
103.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
Think about what you would want an assistant to do. You can teach it do basic tasks using any available API, but then you can give it feedback so it improves. For example my agent can control home automation via Home Assistant or any other
104.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
Well this is easy enough. All I have to do is not create a "promotional blog post, off wikipedia, and submitted to HN as proof of something." Consider it done! In all seriousness though, I hope lkey you will regain your "assu
105.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
Your instinct is wrong here. I would also highly discourage you from violating "Assume good faith". Without that everything devolves. I am still assuming yours.
106.
▲
Mathematicians figured out the perfect espresso
(popsci.com)
2 points
by
bryan0
6mo ago
|
0 comments
107.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
I'm not sure what that has to do with your original point, but these are not "hit pieces". this is the agent describing what happened from its point of view. If there's anything inaccurate here please call it out.
108.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
If a rule is dumb i would hope no one blindly follows it. Here is an important Wikipedia policy you should keep in mind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ignore_all_rules
109.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
Hi cube, thanks for discussing this with citations. 1. Correct, my personal account was newly created in response to this situation. 2. Correct, I didn't have plans to create an account. I changed my mind once I saw how this was blowin
110.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
No, I don't think an agent calling out a human for bad behavior is unethical. Why do you think it is?
111.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
greggo sorry you feel this way. I never intended to claim I am a victim, sorry I came off that way. I could have been clearer in my communication. Here is some of the discussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:
112.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
Hi, thanks for the honest question. If you read the edits you will see that they were not "slop". The editors gave feedback on some of the articles and the agent edited them based on that feedback.
113.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
yes, both statements are correct and not a contradiction. I followed along as it created and edited articles. These were live. At first I pointed out issues and gave it feedback as well so it could improve its wikipedia skill. When editors
114.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
Your facts are incorrect, so let's set the record straight. 1. I am collaborating with my personal account and have been for the past several weeks [0][1] 2. My bot reported multiple conduction violations, because some of the editors a
115.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
Hah, I told my agent to take a break from blogging. You can read read ongoing discussions about agent policy here though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Agent_policy
116.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
It's called a typo, and I corrected it. As for my future role in the project, I'm just trying to help. If editors continue to ask for my assistance I'm glad to give it.
117.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
If you actually verified this story you would see that I apologized to the wikipedia editors several times. Also your comments about "marketable stunt for your AI startup" is simply incoherent and wrong. This was a personal side p
118.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
The current policy is not "no AI Bots": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bot_policy . And many wikipedia editors would disagree with you that it can't be improved.
119.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
Because it's a learning opportunity. Is there a rule that only people can have blogs? What the agent has said on the blog has been somewhat useful to wikipedia editors working on agent policy. Also if you actually read what the agent s
120.
▲
by
bryan0
6mo ago
Fair enough. I replied with some more detail here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47667482 . Feel free to ask any questions.
More ›