bryan0

6 ms·

31.
by bryan0 1mo ago
> Their design appears to have it roots in the (false) idea that what was holding back nuclear was perception of safety, rather than cost. And why do you think they cost so much? Because people need to believe they are safe from catastro
32.
by bryan0 1mo ago
Right I guess that was your main point. This would be a pivot away from capitalism. But it’s unclear what would be a capitalism-based proposal which addresses the issues. Has anyone seriously proposed one?
33.
by bryan0 1mo ago
There will be a workforce, it just won't be human-based. Capitalism has always existed without 100% employment, in every example someone needs to work to support others who cannot. Humans have done this under capitalism to support thei
34.
by bryan0 1mo ago
> It assumes an even production of all goods that people might need, but there isn't, you are giving everyone fiat currency that is not inherently tied to any physical good. Is what you're saying that since UBI would disconnect
35.
by bryan0 1mo ago
We have to define AGI first. Then depending on the definition we may be able recognize it when we make it. Most would probably think a definition of AGI that we couldn’t recognize would not be a great definition. Also AGI almost certainly d
36.
by bryan0 1mo ago
Notice parent said “comparable to” not “exactly like”. Then it is reasonable to assume there is a comparison to be made between your experience and others. It’s not a binary thing. Now llm “experience” might have a very tiny relationship to
37.
by bryan0 1mo ago
Yes, I think we all agree AI companies should not be responsible or expected to come up with the best AI policies for society. Gates addresses this directly: > It is great that some AI companies are proposing solutions to challenges rais
38.
by bryan0 1mo ago
> One look at who is in the driver's seat should give you the answer to this question. I think you are fundamentally misunderstanding the question Gates is asking here. He’s not asking “how this going to play out?”, he’s asking “how
39.
by bryan0 1mo ago
Not sure why you're getting down voted but this does seem like the key point. There obviously is a major challenge in avoiding conspiratorial nonsense in societies with strong freedom of speech, but in this example we have China facing
40.
by bryan0 1mo ago
The article has a chart with this data. They credit “Ramp AI index”. The chart’s a bit confusing though, like what are the units of the y-axis?
41.
by bryan0 1mo ago
Yeah for me Fable works great on the $100 plan. The problem with Fable is you will hit the weekly limit. The $200 plan does not give you 4x or even 2x the weekly limit. For me i only get about 1.3x weekly quota, so I don’t think it’s worth
42.
Nvidia Is Spending $6B to Build a Powerful U.S. Alternative to Chinese AI(wsj.com)
4 points by bryan0 1mo ago|0 comments
43.
Humanoid robots surpass human records in 100M, high jump(espn.com)
2 points by bryan0 2mo ago|0 comments
44.
by bryan0 2mo ago
I hate articles that do this as well in the title. It's basically just a form of clickbait.
45.
by bryan0 2mo ago
That's not what the study says. from the abstract: > We conclude that while context files are useful for specifying non-standard coding practices, any attempts to improve performance should be rigorously evaluated before deployment.
46.
Employers are ghosting college grads and rescinding offers(sfgate.com)
28 points by bryan0 2mo ago|4 comments
47.
by bryan0 2mo ago
Yeah, maybe I'm just getting older. Not sure how you would measure it, but maybe it would be % of posts with "nuanced" discussions. It feels like HN was gone way downhill in this regard, but who knows.
48.
by bryan0 2mo ago
I find it surprising how many people think we're doomed when it comes to AI, and don't even want to try use this technology in a positive way. I'm not sure if this is a modern american cultural thing or what.
49.
by bryan0 2mo ago
I think this is the wrong attitude to have. There is moral complexity in these topics and it's better for people to openly share their concerns rather than pick a side and "shut up". Yes you might find it annoying, but that&#
50.
by bryan0 2mo ago
Why hasn't looking at EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) become a more standard approach than just raw CVEs?
51.
Claudish to English(github.com)
6 points by bryan0 2mo ago|2 comments
52.
by bryan0 2mo ago
I'm not sure what's crazier: AI improving a lower bound on RH, or AI improving a lower bound on RH and it not even making the front page of HN.
53.
by bryan0 2mo ago
Once again Tao helpfully publishes his conversation with GPT to help him understand the proof: https://chatgpt.com/share/6a74dfc3-c614-83e8-b36b-9b07bf8d55...
54.
by bryan0 2mo ago
> Spend most time prioritizing/discussing what to do. you should probably be doing this discussion work along with Fable 5. It will give good feedback if you're working on the correct things. > Come up with QA plan and have
55.
by bryan0 2mo ago
I'm still using Fable 5 right now without usage credits
56.
Guided by the Beauty of Our Weapons (2017)(lesswrong.com)
1 points by bryan0 2mo ago|0 comments
57.
by bryan0 2mo ago
I (like presumably many others) have built something similar. My main difference though is that the critics operate on each stage of development before it can move onto the next. The stages are defined by deliverable artifacts: issue, plan,
58.
by bryan0 2mo ago
What’s even more puzzling is that line of reasoning was one reason why trump was elected in the first place: increase domestic oil supply and get out of foreign wars
59.
by bryan0 2mo ago
Thanks for the pointer to lesswrong. The relevant article on this topic appears to be here: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/pQYEPitFqztcRvBsS/openai-s-u... Just glanced at it and it looks pretty good!
60.
by bryan0 2mo ago
this gets more nuanced because "the sigmoids won't save you": https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/the-sigmoids-wont-save-you

More ›