brulard

10 ms·

91.
by brulard 1y ago
Why wouldn't they? You want to use a state-of-the-art AI somewhere, you don't want to pay new subscription for that one game you want to try out. You can set a limit / spending cap on the api keys and revoke them right after
92.
by brulard 1y ago
I said that based on you saying you exhaust a million token context windows easily. I'm no expert on that, but I think the current state of LLMs works best if you are not approaching that 1M token limit, because large context (reported
93.
by brulard 1y ago
That's what I'm thinking about a lot. Something like the models "activate" just some subset of parameters when working (if I understand the new models correctly). So that model could activate parts of context which are r
94.
by brulard 1y ago
No special setup, just something along "test with playwright" in the process list. It can get stuck, but for me it was not often enough for me to care. If it happens, I push it in the right direction.
95.
by brulard 1y ago
Well, this is the way we could do it for 2 years already, but basically you are doing the transport layer for the process, which can not be efficient. If you really want to have tight control of what exactly the LLM sees, than that's s
96.
by brulard 1y ago
I was getting to stuck state with Gemini and to lesser extent with Sonnet 4, but my cases were resolved by Opus. I think it is mostly due to size of the task and if you split it in advance to smaller chunks, all these models has much higher
97.
by brulard 1y ago
Compact is a reasonable default way to do that, but quite often it discards important details. It's better to have CC to store important details, decisions and reasons in a document where it can be reviewed and modified if needed.
98.
by brulard 1y ago
> These issues are inherent to the technology That's simply false. Even if LLMs don't produce correct and valid code on first shot 100% times of the cases, if you use an agent, it's simply a matter of iterations. I have cl
99.
by brulard 1y ago
What do you mean by website? An HTML doc?
100.
by brulard 1y ago
I don't think thats the opposite. I have an idea what I want and to some extent how I want it to be done. The design document starts with a brainstorming where I throw all my ideas at the agent and we iterate together. > Also the lo
101.
by brulard 1y ago
I think you misunderstand how context in current LLMs works. To get the best results you have to be very careful to provide what is needed for immediate task progression, and postpone context thats needed later in the process. If you give a
102.
by brulard 1y ago
> From my experience, even the top models continue to fail delivering correctness on many tasks even with all the details and no ambiguity in the input. You may feel like there are all the details and no ambiguity in the prompt. But ther
103.
by brulard 1y ago
I believe there IS much art in LLMs and Agents especially. Maybe you can get like 20% boost quite quickly, but there is so much room to grow it to maybe 500% long term.
104.
by brulard 1y ago
You conflate efficient usage of AI with "vibing". Code can be written by AI and still follow the agreed-upon structures and rules and still can and should be thoroughly reviewed. The 3x absolutely does not come for free. But the p
105.
by brulard 1y ago
Oh, man. I think you are right, I can't believe i took it at face value.
106.
by brulard 1y ago
For me it was like this for like a year (using Cline + Sonnet & Gemini) until Claude Code came out and until I learned how to keep context real clean. The key breakthrough was treating AI as an architect/implementer rather than a c
107.
by brulard 1y ago
Well, it turned from the original "breaking down", through "slight discomfort" to "skipping for a benefit". Just let me tell you for someone to break down can mean a panic attack, where they can not catch breat
108.
by brulard 1y ago
Your comment is the only one hateful here. Where I'm from there are absolutely different topics to talk to men and women. You may hate it as much as you like, but that's the world many of us live in.
109.
by brulard 1y ago
This is the worst advice someone could give. It absolutely is ok to decide on your own if it's good for you and the others if you attend or not. I wouldn't want anyone to come to my funeral just because others expect him to.
110.
by brulard 1y ago
Don't do that. You'll spend much of your time tinkering with HW/sw instead of doing what you care for. I recently upgraded to Claude Max ($100 version). It's not cheap, but it would pay for itself. On top of that this lo
111.
by brulard 1y ago
It's the prompt they used to generate this image
112.
by brulard 1y ago
Your point about OS caring about this stuff is solid, but saying a solution is education seems a little bit naive. How are you going to teach people? Or who is going to do that? If node runtime makes its use safer by implementing this, that
113.
by brulard 1y ago
How many apps do you think has properly set user and access rights only to what they need? In production? If even that percentage was high, how about developers machines, people that run some node scripts which might import whoever knows wh
114.
by brulard 1y ago
Same for me. Cursor was a mess for me. I don't know why and how it works for other people. Claude code on the other hand was a success from day one and I'm using it happily for months now.
115.
by brulard 1y ago
It may be incapable to solve loneliness, but it may be very capable to be a bandaid so effective, that people just wouldn't bother to deal with another people.
116.
by brulard 1y ago
Sometimes you don't have tens of hours to spend on a single problem you can not figure out.
117.
by brulard 1y ago
You don't have to. Just try it yourself.
118.
by brulard 1y ago
How does a software product with 98% defect rate look like? Even 2% seems like a lot. Like one in 50 interactions fail, or 1 in 50 data writes produce data corruption.
119.
by brulard 1y ago
On desktop you can, but it opens the tab in the browser.
120.
by brulard 1y ago
Do you have any idea of the software development cost? You may care about your users all you want, maintaining web app and its desktop native counterparts (would you like distinct windows/linux/macos versions?) may be completely u

More ›