browserface

10 ms·

31.
by browserface 6y ago
Good point and great way to think about it. It would be weird if the number of seconds grew quadratically. I guess considering "particle interactions" and "light cone" the number of interactions among particles (and inte
32.
by browserface 6y ago
Underrated comment. Reply anticipation: this is not reddit. Preemptive response, I know, doesn't change the fact that this comment is underrated :);p xx Only thing I want to add: not yet , maybe with CRISPR and artificial wombs there
33.
by browserface 6y ago
That sounds about right. Approx 50 million deaths per year in that frame. 50 years....2.5 billion deaths. So 2.5+1.5 births and 1.5 deaths a second. If you round up deaths to whole numbers, 3 deaths per 2 seconds, maybe that's the erro
34.
Show HN: Bepis – a simple client-side templating lang(github.com)
3 points by browserface 6y ago|0 comments
35.
by browserface 6y ago
The crazy thing is there has only been 1.6 billion seconds since 1970. There have been more babies since 1970 than there have been seconds. Which is crazy. Back then, Earth's population was on 3.7 billion. Now it's 7.8 billion.
36.
by browserface 6y ago
Oh, thanks so much for your replies. Really appreciate your attitude of taking that seriously and trying to mitigate. Not saying that from my point of view of thinking my error is somehow important, just from my experience putting work on H
37.
by browserface 6y ago
yeah exactly. good work
38.
by browserface 6y ago
yeah a mountain or beach retreat would be cool
39.
by browserface 6y ago
that would be cool like 3d printer for cocktails
40.
by browserface 6y ago
Damn I got an error at cell 19 otherwise seemed to work
41.
by browserface 6y ago
I'm sure she'll be fine. She sounds like she already is. She might exceed you. People can teach themselves right? This book looks good but I don't think I should start reading it, because I get the feeling it's going to
42.
by browserface 6y ago
That shouldn't be downvoted. That's a great point, even if most probably misinterpret. In Asia people really don't use email as primary comms in B2C or social for many things. People use LINE, WhatsApp, WeChat and other mail
43.
by browserface 6y ago
Yes there is. It's called "navigator.registerProtocolHandler"[0] [0]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Navigator/r...
44.
by browserface 6y ago
This is great. happy to see someone picking up Tesla's project of 100 years ago.
45.
by browserface 6y ago
This is cool... but a tape deck? Or a pen and paper you scribble in the dark?
46.
by browserface 6y ago
This is so cool. I like this guy's work. I want to see this stuff in a gallery. I mean that, I'm not being flippant or facetious.
47.
Ask HN: What would you make if you had 1000 hours?
7 points by browserface 6y ago|13 comments
48.
by browserface 6y ago
thanks :) ;p xx
49.
Show HN: moronic database built on subdirectories(github.com)
6 points by browserface 6y ago|0 comments
50.
by browserface 6y ago
The degree seems to me to scale up. The sharehouse, the state. It's all the same thing. A sharehouse can be plenty coercive too. Parent - child ? Coercive. Personal relationships, they can be coercive too sadly. But "coercion&quo
51.
by browserface 6y ago
You might agree with most of what I wrote, and disagree with the last paragraph, that's OK, there's plenty of room for diverse opinions, but then I guess my idea is not new to you, except the last paragraph which must be difficult
52.
by browserface 6y ago
If anarchists are anarchists, they shouldn't be cowed by "top down" rules, they should be able to find a way round them, to suit themselves, without destroying themselves. So that it's "not easy" to change coun
53.
by browserface 6y ago
I get that you see it that way. I think that might be shifting the goalposts of anarchism in the face of criticism, and I suspect the appeal to "zero rules" can be brought back later in less critical contexts. But I appreciate the
54.
by browserface 6y ago
Anyone who has ever lived in a share house (or next to one) knows that without laws civilization will descend into absolute chaos and endless tit for tat revenge warfare. Try parenting with anarchist principles. At some point you run into l
55.
by browserface 6y ago
Yeah, I like that. Or fractional_ratio. With part_ratio tho I'm still not sure which part... (the lesser or greater than 1) part. But I like it because it's shorter. Frac_ratio feels like cheating a bit. But I guess a number that&
56.
by browserface 6y ago
David Malouf writes about similar phenomena. I think he even uses a similar term "waves of thought emanating out from somebody around the room" or something, effecting other people.
57.
by browserface 6y ago
Yes, I was thinking something like proper ratio but I don't think that's standard plus I think it's getting pedantic. The takeaway is words are mostly a leaky abstraction, imperfect model for math concepts. But I guess if you
58.
by browserface 6y ago
cargo events? freight events? shipment events? transport events? manifest events? payload events? package events?
59.
by browserface 6y ago
Okay cool thanks
60.
by browserface 6y ago
Ratio? Probability? Proportion? Out of the answers there I like AccuracyNormalized best. That immediately conveys (to me at least) what it is and what its magnitude will be bounded by. Or...if you were writing Java or Swift NonNegativeMagni

More ›