bronson

77 ms·

841.
by bronson 12y ago
In theory you could see it, but you couldn't think about it or use it -- you need to follow clean room rules. It's two sides of the same issue: either way, the code is not available to you.
842.
by bronson 12y ago
This is a great reply, but it gets very deep into parsing and subjective opinion without coming to any sort of concrete conclusions (that can be applied to licensing anyway). Personally, I'm happy for others to use most of my code with
843.
by bronson 12y ago
If you read my second sentence, it's obvious I don't think that. Why put words in my mouth?
844.
by bronson 12y ago
That's true of GPL code too... If my project is GPLv2, then GPLv3 code is not available to distribute or play with. Personally I'm happy for people to use and modify the code I've given away, even if they don't choose t
845.
by bronson 12y ago
> I said that freedom does not inherently mean no limitations. No, it pretty much does: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/freedom It's true that too much freedom can produce awful results but let's
846.
by bronson 12y ago
It's been noted before, The S Stands for Simple: http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/xml/soap/simple
847.
by bronson 12y ago
I wish you'd said this in a less childish way. The point about GPLv2/v3 conflicts demonstrating how unfree the GPL can be is good, but the post itself is downvotable.
848.
by bronson 12y ago
So, BSD/MIT are the software license equivalent to allowing people to kill without repercussion? It seems your analogy is a wee bit overwrought.
849.
by bronson 12y ago
If you spend a long time damaging your project's internal organization, expect to spend a long time digging back out.
850.
by bronson 12y ago
To set up the interview, the recruiter sends your contact details to the company. Once that happens, as far as that company is concerned, the recruiter owns you.
851.
by bronson 12y ago
That is astonishing. Goes to show how simple stuff can turn into hellish soup once all the requirements are in.
852.
by bronson 12y ago
How do you know the person who clicked the "Reply" button is the same person who wrote those words?
853.
by bronson 12y ago
The confidence band example comes close. Might work until real candlesticks are implemented.
854.
by bronson 12y ago
You'll care if it's powered by something with a little more kick, like plutonium.
855.
by bronson 12y ago
All contributors are lazy: http://threevirtues.com/
856.
by bronson 12y ago
And yet you have time to rant and steam here, which took more time than reading what a "ref", "object", and "head" is. Interesting priorities.
857.
by bronson 12y ago
It's not hyperbole, development has pretty much ground to a halt: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzr-pqm/bzr/bzr.dev/changes
858.
by bronson 12y ago
Also, maybe split "C, C++"? C is one of my favorite languages, C++ not so much. Not serious, but I think it would produce interesting results.
859.
by bronson 12y ago
Belt sander. Also, a sharp burr and very high RPM works OK for me. Just don't inhale the dust!
860.
by bronson 12y ago
Why? Loctite Blue is meant to be disassembled and reassembled: http://www.loctiteproducts.com/p/t_lkr_blue/overview/Loctite... Gyms clearly don't use loctite, but I think it's just because the prob
861.
by bronson 12y ago
I love the idea of a two part nut that cams itself tight. If weight and corrosion isn't a problem, this could see some good applications. Maybe locating on spinning shafts in high heat, or in blind holes? Stage 8 and safety wire seem
862.
by bronson 12y ago
Since the customers typically tighten loose holds themselves, I would guess that the maintenance cost is vanishingly small. It's definitely safer than a plain nut, agreed, but is it noticeably safer than any of the other thread locking
863.
by bronson 12y ago
Nope! There's no way any climbing gym would rebuild its walls to be full of expensive proprietary nuts. If they cared, they could use loctite or lock washers. It seems there's very little money in fixing spun holds.
864.
by bronson 12y ago
They're called jam nuts and they're a nightmare in production. These days I think they're only used where the application isn't critical, the labor is skilled and underpaid, and you're fresh out of lock washers and
865.
by bronson 12y ago
Last I saw they were writing a VimL->Lua transcoder. I think they'll allow scripting in any language, but Lua will be the core language and have the best support. I donated to NeoVim few months ago and I'll donate again. Real
866.
by bronson 12y ago
I made a quick video with the same conclusion: stay on 2012 and wait until a worthy upgrade comes along. (Well, unless you want PCIe SSD I/O bandwith -- that's much faster. But multicore is sooo much slower that it's not a
867.
by bronson 12y ago
I can see the difference too. For whatever reason, text in Sublime with the same theme looks sharper than Vim (Yosemite). Maybe it's because it's not surrounded by ugly text rulers and inverse mode split bars, or maybe the text
868.
by bronson 12y ago
As opposed to Angular? Not sure what you're trying to say here.
869.
by bronson 12y ago
No, ActiveRecord never looks at argument names. (unless you're talking about Ruby's named parameters, which is nothing like Angular's DI and not AR-specific)
870.
by bronson 12y ago
Especially if you write it on a team with other people.

More ›