bronson

5 ms·

31.
by bronson 3mo ago
> In addition, Mojang and King will now report directly to me. Darn it! The ONE studio that I really wanted them to set free and go back to how well things worked before, and they tighten their grip. Whyyyy?
32.
by bronson 3mo ago
> This is now out in the August 31 release! Almost a year ago, that is SO COOL! I'll be trying CoMaps for store hours now.
33.
by bronson 3mo ago
AMEN! 100% agree. Plus a reasonably inexpensive super low-latency interconnect.
34.
by bronson 3mo ago
And how much can you buy a 128GB Mac Studio for now? Go look. I think you'll be shocked.
35.
by bronson 3mo ago
This is an odd comment. Pins are seriously expensive. Companies don't just throw them in for fun. Usually they're necessary for signal integrity or packaging constraints.
36.
by bronson 3mo ago
There's one more for me: reliable store hours.
37.
by bronson 3mo ago
This IS a criticism of the end product.
38.
by bronson 3mo ago
If they paid the 35% that I pay, then it would be fair. It sounds like you think billionaires should pay close to 0%?
39.
by bronson 3mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor_count#Transistor_de...
40.
by bronson 3mo ago
> it should be trivial regardless. So should nuclear fission reactors. The concept is absurdly simple. In practice, however ...
41.
by bronson 3mo ago
> those are trivial problems in the well (and oil) drilling industry. Ah yes, an industry well known for its adherence to safety standards and never having surprising blowouts.
42.
by bronson 3mo ago
Sounds like people building it found a way to cheap out that was technically within regulation.
43.
by bronson 4mo ago
Vibed infrastructure? That sounds like it undoes a lot of Nix's advantages.
44.
by bronson 4mo ago
> I can't tell you the amount of times I've pulled a precompiled tool and it just doesnt work because of one quirk of their packaging or another. This is a serious problem in Nix too. I often trip over buggy and abandoned Nix p
45.
by bronson 4mo ago
Ah yes, the ol' GitHub method of reporting. "When we're up, we have lots of nines!"
46.
by bronson 4mo ago
And built well, which has been a source of big delays in the past.
47.
by bronson 4mo ago
> Owing to spite or just a foul mood, have you ever peeled one of those stupid Calvin stickers off of a pickup truck? I figure that, long after the strip is forgotten, those decals are my ticket to immortality. (from the Mentalfloss arti
48.
by bronson 4mo ago
Yeah, so? Turns out the papers were bluffing/complaining. This sort of thing happens in many parts of life.
49.
by bronson 5mo ago
If each Bluray is 2 hours long, that's 4.5 years of nonstop watching.
50.
by bronson 5mo ago
No upside whatsoever? Clearly you're not an insider trader.
51.
by bronson 5mo ago
How is a trusted device associated with a human being? I'm pretty sure the walls of hundreds of bot phones are running trusted Android.
52.
by bronson 5mo ago
Just that you're treating LoC and complexity as useful metrics, when these days those come for free. Or for $3 per Mtok, almost free.
53.
by bronson 5mo ago
No, they're saying that it was misleading. OP said "I'm building an open source Google Photos alternative" and surprisingly didn't say "based on Immich". This dramatically changes the evaluation of "o
54.
by bronson 5mo ago
Perfect OK Boomer response. If this is parody then I salute you! So good.
55.
by bronson 5mo ago
Right. So why would I use this?
56.
by bronson 5mo ago
Because they're taking water from already parched regions, often pumping it out of the ground. Even if the water did come back locally as rain (it doesn't), it still makes it impossible for people to live off the same aquifers and
57.
by bronson 5mo ago
I think it depends on region. Related, many speakers pronounce chips and salza, Tezla, Wezley.
58.
by bronson 6mo ago
But nobody has said that it was a deliberate conspiracy/attack. Definitely not the OP. Who are you replying to?
59.
by bronson 6mo ago
And I'm positive that you understand the spirit of the post you're replying to. The saying implies that incompetence and malice are polar opposites. They're not.
60.
by bronson 6mo ago
Neither does he, that's the beauty of it.

More ›