brazukadev

4 ms·

61.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
No, this article does not look like it was written by prompting AI just because you didn't like it.
62.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
emergent capability they say
63.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> Police officer *arrested* after tracking ex-girlfriend on Flock over 2k times
64.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> People say Google have lost and that they're having their lunch eaten by anthropic That's old news. People are saying the chinese models/labs are eating anthropic lunch.
65.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
WebMCP is a big deal for using a website paired with AI, a better MCP or CLI doesn't do that.
66.
ChatGPT Now Supports WebMCP(twitter.com)
4 points by brazukadev 1mo ago|0 comments
67.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
Everything you described can be replaced by someone + AI. With a much better quality than replacing devs with someone + AI.
68.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> Short-term AI/GPT/LLM consulting services to help you strategize, discuss, and navigate the rapidly evolving world of artificial intelligence.
69.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
yeah the problem is npm is now Microsoft, just like Github. I trust Node. I don't trust NPM.
70.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
It was quite funny, the far right in Brazil elected Elon Musk as their savior. Then he ran with his tail between his legs.
71.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> AI threatens replacement of all cognitive work AI does nothing. CEOs want to use it to replace all cognitive work, it doesn't mean it is inevitable. That is why smart people are fighting against the narrative push.
72.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> if anything real comes out of this, he needs to pay. It doesn't change for you, because you give a powerful multibilionaire criminal the benefit of doubt. We all know he won't be condemned. So it is your decision to only hold
73.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
The VC capital for AI is probably drying up. Now the question is: who will buy OpenAI and Anthropic?
74.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> Is there any particular reason why you respond like this? Lots of people are really, really disgusted by billionaire sexual offenders/pedophiles that won't pay for their crimes. And then another bunch get mad at people defend
75.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
Excel sped up reviews >100x without Bill Gates preaching daily that devs were cooked.
76.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
Everything is changing all the time. The position that everything will change in favor of the AI overlords is an imposed narrative that has a bigger chance of materializing if they get all people to believe it is inevitable. It is not.
77.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> Gates is just trying to buy his way into heaven and a positive view on his wikipedia page. That's gonna be really difficult as the heaven's manager probably have full access to the Epstein files.
78.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
That's a sure way to stay brainwashed.
79.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
Sure. The problem is just an easy fix that nobody there thought about yet.
80.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
Sure but first you gotta be Microsoft.
81.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
probably not. The people that have done it before or willing to do it now is probably a very % of the commit volume, they leaving wouldn't change much, probably not gonna even move the exponential growth needle.
82.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> Are databases not a solved problem? What do you mean by solved problem? I don't own DuckDB (sqlite, postgresql, etc). If I think I can create something as good or better than DuckDB, should I give up doing so (and get filthy rich
83.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> yping code by hand will be relegated to 1%, while 99% will be generated by assistants and agents. The 1% will be 100x bigger than the 100% of 10 years ago.
84.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
it is still wrong. Lots of people created and still create software that just themselves use as competitive advantage in their area of work.
85.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> When I hear stuff like this I always imagine going to a restaurant and asking the waitress for a menu and them replying “lol just google it”. in this case there was a menu in the next empty table and you saw it but in place of getting
86.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
Sure, that makes sense. Thanks for replying. > Here's an example of what we can say: if user A accuses user B of astroturfing, spying, manipulating, etc., and a quick look at B's posting history shows that they were posting to
87.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> what if it only makes the rich richer and we all starve??' Then automation happens anyway Revolutions also happen anyway. Not sure if automated security would be enough to prevent them.
88.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> (I see genAI as a horrible mistake for human societies) GenAI is amazing, how we use it is so far a horrible mistake.
89.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> People often make generic claims about astroturfing, bots, etc. that don't hold up in practice when we look at the data. I'd be very careful with believing the system that looks for bots and astroturfing works well enough to
90.
by brazukadev 1mo ago
> I think microprocessors were the biggest thing, until the internet, then the web, open source, system on a chip, virtualization, cloud, .. and none of them changed society more than the smartphone (starting with the iphone).

More ›