bratsche

38 ms·

361.
by bratsche 14y ago
> Also stop blogging and fix it if it's a problem In case you don't know who mpt is, he's actually one of a handful of people out there who is trying to fix these problems. He worked on usability for Mozilla for awhile, and now he wo
362.
by bratsche 14y ago
I was under the impression that features like routing required the expensive paid Google Maps tier.. is that not the case?
363.
by bratsche 14y ago
If it's aimed at tech geeks, what does it do that we're not already able to do with our myriad of existing devices? I noticed that it conveniently comes with a remote desktop utility.. you know, in case you want to do something other than u
364.
Facebook C++ Conference(facebookcpp.eventbrite.com)
2 points by bratsche 14y ago|0 comments
365.
by bratsche 14y ago
I posted a Sass mixin for doing this here: https://gist.github.com/2645575
366.
by bratsche 14y ago
But neither GCC nor Clang support Microsoft's debug symbols as far as I'm aware. If you're writing libraries for Win32, your users are likely using Visual Studio and they're going to get unhelpful stack traces without those debug symbol fil
367.
by bratsche 14y ago
MonoTouch does give you a native experience. It's basically a C# binding for native APIs. It also has a few nice extras like MonoTouch.Dialog which provides a much nicer API for doing iPhone dialogs than using UITableView (although you ca
368.
by bratsche 14y ago
Interestingly enough, you can also run C# on NativeClient via Mono.
369.
by bratsche 14y ago
Seriously, why is this on hacker news? This is ridiculous. I'd downvote this if we were on reddit. :)
370.
by bratsche 14y ago
I haven't tried it with 12.04 yet, but I've had poor experience getting Gnome installed and running decently in the last couple versions of Ubuntu. It seems like Fedora is the easiest way to use it.
371.
by bratsche 14y ago
Gnome did no such thing. Unity is developed entirely by Canonical, they own full copyright on it and they employ all the developers for it. They can add any options they want, and they can omit any options they want. Gnome doesn't even fact
372.
by bratsche 15y ago
His job is to write something that people will read. And here we are, five years later, reading what he wrote. It looks like he succeeded. :)
373.
by bratsche 15y ago
Kind of funny that you say this, since CoffeeScript inserts semicolons. The lack of semicolons is the one major thing in the Github style guide that I think is stupid. It seems silly to avoid using semicolons in Javascript because it actua
374.
by bratsche 15y ago
Debian and Ubuntu shouldn't be in the business of trying to second-guess upstreams. They should be packaging things up as they're released.
375.
by bratsche 15y ago
Long enough to to let the Internet get fucked over. And I'm sorry, but outside tech people I know almost nobody who really uses Twitter. I know a ton of people who have Twitter accounts and almost none of them ever use it. The influence of
376.
by bratsche 15y ago
Another thing which OSX has done for a long time that I really liked is that everything syncs to vertical refresh. It doesn't actually speed anything up, but it gives the perception that things are smoother and more responsive. You don't
377.
by bratsche 15y ago
Ubuntu has a rails package already, and nobody uses it. It only serves to confuse new users. Trying to mix deb and gem just hasn't worked well so far. Making a Rails.app for Mac is different though, because everything would be isolated in
378.
by bratsche 15y ago
It's more than that though. It seemed really clear that a lot of people thought this was useful, and you blew off all objections without really explaining sufficiently why. It's not that big of a deal, and it sucks that everyone wasted so
379.
by bratsche 15y ago
Until they make such a feature, https://github.com/jacksonh/gitmarks (edit: put the wrong gitmarks project in here, updated to the one I meant)
380.
by bratsche 15y ago
I started using Mac now. Some things I like about it, some things I don't.
381.
by bratsche 15y ago
Well, cool! I'm glad someone picked it up. Maybe if I ever use Linux desktop again I'll see it being used. :)
382.
by bratsche 15y ago
Get ready to have so many problems with Wayland in 5.. 4.. 3.. 2..
383.
by bratsche 15y ago
I'm the one who started working on client-side decorations for gtk+ originally, just as an experiment (but with encouragement from Kristian Høgsberg). After I quit Canonical I never heard that anyone else had picked up the branch, but ever
384.
by bratsche 15y ago
It doesn't mean the project is failing. Kubuntu had only a single developer from Canonical, and numerous other developers. This just means that Canonical doesn't feel like funding a KDE desktop anymore with that one developer. It doesn't me