braiamp

10 ms·

181.
by braiamp 1y ago
Dude, if someone is saying "hey we will pack up, we have nothing to do here" out of the blue, I would like a more nuanced conversation that written text could not hope to convey. We are humans and while reading is perfectly capabl
182.
by braiamp 1y ago
OWASP usually gives you sane defaults https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Password_Stor...
183.
by braiamp 1y ago
> A cynical modern legal strategy is to bombard people with frivolous legal actions that only the well-heeled can afford Why only describe them and not go for the easiest example: Nintendo.
184.
by braiamp 1y ago
Interesting. I've done a light thread following of this group, but it seems to exists only since February of this year. That's... an interesting timing.
185.
by braiamp 1y ago
Why should wikipedia protect itself from fringe, when it doesn't need to try to? If your fringe theory becomes the widely accepted one, it will naturally change the wording of the article, just based on sourcing alone.
186.
by braiamp 1y ago
Wikipedia is not meant to appear neutral, it's meant to "mirror the current consensus of mainstream scholarship [... aka] 'accepted knowledge'". Basically, if the accepted knowledge of an event is that it is not a g
187.
by braiamp 1y ago
The top one is usually a background speaker, and not the focus of the scene. It is extremely rare that directors do that anyways.
188.
by braiamp 1y ago
I remember watching a video a decade ago, of someone doing review of the subs for each group that was doing Black Rock Shooter, specifically the wheelchair scene, because what it's said has to be taken within the context of what's
189.
by braiamp 1y ago
> The easiest way is to actively work to make a high-profile project successful Oh, my sweet summer child. Do you really believe that I would be allowed to be able to make a high profile project successful? I literally have been sideline
190.
by braiamp 1y ago
That comment is... weird, considering they disabled the accounts of certain International Court of Justice that were individually targeted.
191.
by braiamp 1y ago
What part of "people pushing for that theory wanted to have a conspiration instead" was missed? I don't care what you think it happened, I just don't want to hear more conspiration. I'm tired of that. We are humans,
192.
by braiamp 1y ago
Note, that in their letter they carefully avoided mention what happened during Trump 1.0 administration. Their policies started before Biden was president, so this is 100% throwing Biden admin under the bus.
193.
by braiamp 1y ago
Which is still a debunked theory. Nobody created SARS-CoV-2 for nefarious purposes. The best theory we have is that there was a failure in the contention. But people pushing for that theory wanted to have a conspiration instead, when plain
194.
by braiamp 1y ago
There's one comment literally spreading misinformation and it isn't flagged, but instead got pushback by others, critically pointing the weakness of their arguments.
195.
by braiamp 1y ago
The reason why you are asked better source is because, and let me say this slowly, anyone can post any crap on the internet without repercussions. Lets start with the one that references "Sasha Latypova". If I search her credentia
196.
by braiamp 1y ago
If you read those documents, you will see that the administration was telling them that those accounts were in violation of Twitter TOS. They simply said "hey, this user is violating your TOS, what are you gonna do about it?", and
197.
by braiamp 1y ago
You don't see those, because it's on their faces. Or more accurately on our faces. I live in such country, and we kill for having our kids vaccinated. We live these diseases, so we aren't so stupid to fall for misinformation.
198.
by braiamp 1y ago
> But I think we have to realize silencing people doesn't work It actually does work. You need to remove ways for misinformation to spread, and suppressing a couple of big agents works very well. - https://www.nature.com&
199.
by braiamp 1y ago
This isn't a Mr Beast problem, it's a industry problem: > Frontiers: How Much Influencer Marketing Is Undisclosed? Evidence from Twitter > We study the disclosure of influencer posts on Twitter across a large set of brands b
200.
by braiamp 1y ago
They have exceptions to several categories of IP https://archive.org/about/dmca.php Also, they have a policy already https://help.archive.org/help/rights/ Unless you are claiming that they do
201.
by braiamp 1y ago
> It's related, it demonstrates the IA's attitude toward copyright and how it's already gotten them into trouble Then why the case makes no reference to that?
202.
by braiamp 1y ago
Everything under %USERPROFILE% is user data, so having "My" for directories living under it makes zero sense. XDG user dirs is good enough to tell you where you put stuff and for programs to find them.
203.
by braiamp 1y ago
Linus Sebastian, from LTT asked Noctua CEO if they had the best engineers. He said they had good engineers but also give them time and resources to develop good products.
204.
by braiamp 1y ago
I have NoScript by default set to no run. Some sites work better without it.
205.
by braiamp 1y ago
He's wrong in the "why" tho. It's not that they must think outside the box, it's that they _must_ not all focus on a single point of research. I'm pretty sure that they are also pursuing popular research topics
206.
by braiamp 1y ago
All external injuries (mostly traumas, but also burns, poison, frostbite, etc.) that result in deaths, no matter their intention (murder, accident, suicide) have 2 chapters dedicated in the International Classification of Diseases 10 (als
207.
by braiamp 1y ago
And neither of those are being tackled at all. It's as it's all or nothing. I prefer always to tackle complex problems through multiple angles, because they are complex.
208.
by braiamp 1y ago
It doesn't matter because it is up to Steam what products they list to sell, not to MC/Visa.
209.
by braiamp 1y ago
They should be allowing all lawful transactions, and if they can't, they should get broken up.
210.
by braiamp 1y ago
They cite a rule about Mastercard brand damage. If Mastercard didn't specify that such content would result in MC brand damage why would they cite it rather than their own rules?

More ›