bpt3

8 ms·

91.
by bpt3 5mo ago
So what would satisfy you?
92.
by bpt3 5mo ago
Seems like your blame is quite misplaced.
93.
by bpt3 5mo ago
They created the concept of CSAM?
94.
by bpt3 5mo ago
For people who abuse the concept, sure. Again, that's just evidence that you're clear to drop the initial assumption.
95.
by bpt3 5mo ago
It's probably why this "vulnerability" feels like the type of defects you'd see in Windows or desktop applications 20+ years ago. The root cause was and a complete lack of effort to even attempt to secure things because
96.
by bpt3 5mo ago
The potential issues are innumerable, which is why this breathless "vulnerability" report is pointless. It's like someone writing a threat report on a car about an individual crash. Did you know cars can cause damage if you&#
97.
by bpt3 5mo ago
This is a permissions issue with the spreadsheet. It's not all that different from people realizing that several popular model servers didn't support access control and could execute commands. It's an inherent part of the des
98.
by bpt3 5mo ago
Yes, I'm saying that HN is very far left, which wasn't the case just a few years ago. It's mostly a progressive echo chamber at this point plus some interesting tech news.
99.
by bpt3 5mo ago
What about this is a vulnerability, let alone one that requires responsible disclosure? Untrusted data sources can provide data that causes bad things to occur. If that's a vulnerability, then any application that ingests data is riddl
100.
by bpt3 5mo ago
You can assume good faith initially without having to tolerate a bad actor who invalidates that assumption. It seems like your company leadership missed that part of the lesson.
101.
by bpt3 5mo ago
This website is slightly to the right of reddit these days; what exactly would expressing a negative opinion about a conservative blogger do to their main account? My suspicion was some affiliation with a current or future implicated indivi
102.
by bpt3 5mo ago
3 down, thousands to go. This will continue until Elsevier and their 3 or 4 peers are removed from the academic publishing process entirely.
103.
by bpt3 5mo ago
What troubling language and slurs are you referring to exactly? I didn't see anything "troubling" (let alone "extremely troubling") or anything that would indicate that anyone other than the implicated authors have
104.
by bpt3 5mo ago
The point of the line is not that they aren't going to try, it's an acknowledgement of the extreme challenge in diversifying in the short term and incentivizing the next generations who are very, very comfortable with the status q
105.
by bpt3 6mo ago
It's not a rugpull, because there's nothing invested by users. Again, there's no alternative that meets your original criteria let alone your additional ones.
106.
by bpt3 6mo ago
If that's your standard, you basically can't interact with any entity other than megacorps, which you obviously disdain. What is the benefit of that perspective? It's just social media. If it goes away tomorrow, no real loss.
107.
by bpt3 6mo ago
I think LLMs would do a better job. I was about to respond saying what a terrible article it was, as it reads as if the author has no idea what he was talking about. Attempting to paraphrase the original article would explain it.
108.
by bpt3 6mo ago
What does the FBI have to do with video streams at a JCC? And isn't flock doing the vetting? This sounds a lot like BD guys doing demos with random data from a customer that agreed to show allow access and a local citizen getting very
109.
by bpt3 6mo ago
By whom? The regulators are the ones signing up for these services.
110.
by bpt3 6mo ago
Some unsolicited feedback from someone who was at one point part of your target audience for this product: * You need to put some text on the pages on your site describing what this actually is and who is working on it. No one is taking the
111.
by bpt3 6mo ago
That's objectively false, with the article in question being example #1.
112.
by bpt3 6mo ago
Because it's not a requirement, and most people are not intentionally or accidentally defrauding the government. The issue is that there is no incentive to do the additional work necessary to generate reproducible results because of th
113.
by bpt3 6mo ago
As I said to the parent poster, that's not what it means at all. It means that you should look at the system's incentives, not the behavior of individuals as the root cause of any issues. You don't need to be a "cheating
114.
by bpt3 6mo ago
> Don't get upset at me for being an awful person, I probably wouldn't have succeeded if I'd been a good person That's not what that phrase means in general, and it's normally not used to describe one's own
115.
by bpt3 6mo ago
It's a lightly edited stream of consciousness commentary that appears to have been written by a non-native English speaker, potentially translated from Dutch into English after the initial writing. I wouldn't say it's pleasan
116.
by bpt3 6mo ago
How do you delegate, direct, and validate results if you have no idea what you're looking at? This is the same issue many managers of people have for the same reason.
117.
by bpt3 6mo ago
And it still doesn't matter because the point is that there is much better access to higher education and its ancillary benefits in LA, not that a commute that no one has any reason to make is longer at times than it would take on aver
118.
by bpt3 6mo ago
Why would I put much effort into responding to a post like yours, which makes no sense and just shows that you don't understand what you're talking about?
119.
by bpt3 6mo ago
That is a nonsensical analogy on multiple levels, and doesn't even support your own argument.
120.
by bpt3 6mo ago
In this case, the "fall guy" is the person who actually introduced the code in question into the codebase. They wouldn't be some patsy that is around just to take blame, but the actual responsible party for the issue.

More ›