Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
boyter
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
63 ms
·
661.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
If you voted liberal in the last election then sorry you made your bed, otherwise I sympathise. This if for backbone infrastructure though and I think it's likely you will see gigabit connections in the next 10 years just at an enormou
662.
▲
September 2016 Product Updates: The New UI Gets Even More Powerful…
(blog.scalyr.com)
1 points
by
boyter
10y ago
|
0 comments
663.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Reminds me a lot of this https://rogeralsing.com/2008/12/07/genetic-programming-evolu...
664.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
I find Sourcegraph really interesting as a different approach to code indexing. Opengrok, Krugle, BitBucket Server and my own poor attempt searchcode and the downloadable server version simply index the source code as is which is to just in
665.
▲
Gorgonia: a library like Theano or TensorFlow, mainly written in Go
(blog.chewxy.com)
180 points
by
boyter
10y ago
|
53 comments
666.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Thanks so much for replying. I did notice the Moral License and was confused as to how it works. I will attempt to get some high profile users I know to help pay for some continued development.
667.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
From the release notes http://varnish.org/docs/5.0/whats-new/relnote-5.0.html "It is important that people understand that Free and Open Source Software isn't the same as gratis software: Somebody h
668.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
I considered that but assuming things get to that point I feel I will have either done well enough for it to be a moot issue or I have run out of ideas. At this point I feel it should be available for all to use.
669.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
To be honest I am not looking for collaboration at this point. The orginal reason for posting the source is because this indexes your source code and many raised concerns that it could potentially be phoning home with your code. Being able
670.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Actually it's nothing to do with collaboration. The source is fair source because I want you to be able to check that there are no phone home methods sending me your source code. The GPL portion is there to ensure that if someone does
671.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Actually the reason I posted source was not because I wanted collaboration but due to fears that it was somehow phoning home with your valuable source code. I wanted resolve this issue by allowing anyone to vet the source code before rollin
672.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Something for me to fix. I will sort this issue out over the next few days.
673.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
That is correct. I do not anticipate much feedback from others.
674.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
I had considered that but since this is a product that indexes source code a lot of companies want to host on premise.
675.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Actually following that time frame I will be updating the fork to relicense to avoid this issue. I had hoped that the intent mentioned was clear enough to avoid any issues. If someone with legal chops wanta to provide a nice legal way of sa
676.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Believe it or not thats actually one of the least requested features. The most requested is the one I am implementing for the next release 1.3.0 which is historical searches across every commit for auditing purposes. That said I am working
677.
▲
GPL Time Bomb – an interesting approach to FOSS licensing
(boyter.org)
162 points
by
boyter
10y ago
|
116 comments
678.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Not really sure if I want to give this one away as I want to use it more myself but https://nugget.one/ seems to be applicable here. They claim to do most of the filtering for ideas for you showing market size, how to reach
679.
▲
To All Companies Currently Recruiting
(boyter.org)
2 points
by
boyter
10y ago
|
0 comments
680.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
True. The NBN was supposed to fix that but became politicised and that was the end of that. The mobile networks however are first rate despite having low download quotas. On Vodafone (a cheaper network) where I live I get 60 mbit down and 3
681.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Thats a pretty good point I suppose. I do track that information so it wouldn't be too difficult to implement I guess.
682.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Thank you. That's one that comes up a lot. The trick is knowing the difference between the two which I am still thinking about how to implement. If you could email me at bboyte01@gmail.com that would be very helpful. It looks like most
683.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
I have written about it all here (I maintain searchcode.com ) http://www.boyter.org/category/searchcode/ specifically http://www.boyter.org/2013/02/why-code-search-is-difficult/ is
684.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Hi, I'm the guy behind searchcode.com Could you possible let me know what results aren't working for you? Im well aware that its due for some improvements in the search area and feedback is always helpful.
685.
▲
Leidos closes Lockheed merger
(delimiter.com.au)
14 points
by
boyter
10y ago
|
3 comments
686.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Totally agree. It's one of the reasons I created searchcode.com back before github had code search and after google code search closed. I doubled down by offering the locally installable one which I then deployed at my workplace. It ha
687.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
I am familiar with the FSF line on this. The same argument applies to any closed source software. However I want to know why OP is against the Fair Source licence, especially if it is time-bombed with a clause that reverts to GPL after a pe
688.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
What exactly is your issue with that licence? I ask having published some code under it recently. I understand that it's "non free" but half the time people on seem to want source because they think they should see it. I am g
689.
▲
Open Source Windows May Not Be That Big a Long Shot After All
(fortune.com)
2 points
by
boyter
10y ago
|
0 comments
690.
▲
by
boyter
10y ago
Yes, but not actually a programmer. The guy was hired to be a project manager. After joining things were as expected but after a few weeks we noticed that he was rarely around after lunch and never around after lunch on a Friday. We would e
More ›