Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bowsamic
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
36 ms
·
661.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
I think you’ve misjudged the culture here
662.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
I’m from working class England and that’s absolutely not the culture for us. Education is considered superfluous unless it makes you money
663.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
I’m glad to be proven wrong. I’m English btw. We learnt nothing about America but we learnt everything about King Henry VIII
664.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
Yes, those things cannot be blamed
665.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
No one that I know of in Europe gets taught this
666.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
No. I like the current system and I will continue to use it even if OP somehow manages to make everyone switch over, which they won’t manage to
667.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
> small issues are easy to solve! Citation heavily needed
668.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
I find it weird when people take a long time for these little things. My wife still struggles with the German numbers (85 = fünfundachtzig) and the half thing with time (8:30 = halb neun) even though I managed to switch over to those very q
669.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
It’s just greenwashing but for tobacco
670.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
I have no idea how this relates to the conversation
671.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
I don't know what you mean, sorry
672.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
There's a fine line between "I don't need to understand" and "I have no idea what's going on". At some point it becomes unworkable and you have to give up.
673.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
I honestly found even the preface insufferable
674.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
Well the issue is that people panic, since honestly I think we are very insecure about our media literacy
675.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
I think so yes
676.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
I agree, that's the definition
677.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
Except I am still discussing the point: the companies won't stop getting an ROI because "slop" still produces an ROI, even if people know it's slop, because it isn't contentless noise, it has semantic content. Just
678.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
Yes
679.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
I have a PhD in physics and even physics itself is in a poor state, yet I totally get why all the other sciences envy physics: they're even worse
680.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
> it's basically conjectures pilled upon one another. It's not just archeology, history is not much better either. They're both basically pseudosciences
681.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
So I was right, you did use it sarcastically, since you are still naive
682.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
Addressed above
683.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
Adverts have semantic content, they aren't noise.
684.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
No, I'm not being over-literal. Here's why: Yes, it could be that for you a given advert is irrelevant or not worth your while, but the point he was making is that it won't even be worth it for the advertiser to put out t
685.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
What is "just slop" though? A spam advert for a product is still an advert for a product. Therefore it's not just semantic noise, it is still an advert for a product, and therefore his point is invalid: there is an ROI and pe
686.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
No, there are many things technology has improved, not ruined
687.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
“maybe, just maybe” “One can dream.” You’ve either used these sarcastically, or accurately. I think you’ve done the former, but the truth is the latter.
688.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
The emails are discernible from noise though. They literally have a signal to noise ratio higher than one. Noise would be pure rng output. So I don’t know what you’re getting at
689.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
Well the goal is to create companies or teams with a consistent sense of what is positive vs a flaw
690.
▲
by
bowsamic
2y ago
There's such a thing as righteous hate
More ›