boubiyeah

23 ms·

1. 271.▲
   by boubiyeah 13y ago

   Yes, forgive my tone. I should just have said that when it comes to picking a third party framework (I don't always do), I personally prefer the compromises made by Angular than the ones made by Ember. Of course, the biggest compromise of
2. 272.▲
   by boubiyeah 13y ago

   Angular is vastly superior to Ember technology wise; Their approach is also more future proof (No stupid getter/setter, string templates, the architecture is based on something very close to web components, etc)
3. 273.▲
   by boubiyeah 14y ago

   That page cache issue is a real one; Do you think this issue can be worked arround or mitigated? Or is it a tradeoff of using full client side navigation (tradeoff because ALL other navigation kinds are faster)?
4. 274.▲
   by boubiyeah 14y ago

   backbone is just not worth it; May as well use vanilla JS.
5. 275.▲
   by boubiyeah 14y ago

   To people saying "backbone", stop. Backbone is a tiny abstraction that pretty much does nothing; It's the worst of both worlds: You have to use fake getters/setters but the framework is absolutely unhelpful. Angular is more developer friend