bordercases

8 ms·

61.
by bordercases 3y ago
The real argument is around degrees of reconstruction in image. Cameras never depict light fully faithfully in the analog world.
62.
by bordercases 3y ago
Your argument doesn't hold: who was the person that uploaded the document? That person is hireable as a spy.
63.
by bordercases 3y ago
Excellent find. What brought you to it?
64.
by bordercases 3y ago
RAG?
65.
by bordercases 3y ago
I would agree with you if that knowledge wasn't the stuff industrial organization was made of. That is expertise many countries currently lack and have experts come in from overseas to deploy.
66.
by bordercases 3y ago
Did they control for blood sugar or diabetes incidence? (I’ll check) The link between diabetes and retinopathy is conclusive. Between diabetes and dementia or Alzheimer’s, prospective.
67.
by bordercases 3y ago
Contrarians arguing the possibility without evidence yet cited to back it up is not a definitive conclusion, let alone informed.
68.
by bordercases 3y ago
The windows of opportunity would have been narrow to definitively target microplastics as the cause of many diseases where observations of the potential mechanism of action for a morbidity - in this case, probably inflammation or endocrine
69.
by bordercases 3y ago
In which case the skew is positive.
70.
by bordercases 3y ago
If it's counted as an accident rather than a suicide then the numbers are still high. If it's counted as a suicide rather than an accident then maybe. I would then ask who is lying. If it's faking deaths then that's the
71.
by bordercases 3y ago
They would be hard to establish if you didn't have data on the kinds of health problems that would only show up post-plastic.
72.
by bordercases 3y ago
Why only care about the short term?
73.
by bordercases 3y ago
Willful ignorance? It's not like these studies are uncommon now.
74.
by bordercases 3y ago
“Market failure”, “Market gap”
75.
by bordercases 3y ago
They overlap in part because the latter two topics are used to abstract over any mathematics.
76.
by bordercases 3y ago
There are only sixteen possible maps from Z^2 to Z^2.
77.
by bordercases 3y ago
As the resevoir of astroturfed marketing that is still a problem for Reddit.
78.
by bordercases 3y ago
Guix can certainly beat Nix on documentation, with a lot following from that.
79.
by bordercases 3y ago
To burst your bubble: https://digdeeper.neocities.org/articles/browsers#brave
80.
by bordercases 3y ago
Did Apple adopt an approach like this more successfully?
81.
by bordercases 3y ago
I find that anchoring my mathematics to something in the world motivates me more to learn math than math for its own sake. In this case it's quantum computing. Now I love spinors.
82.
by bordercases 3y ago
These tools really need to support self-hosted model integration. We have LLaMA.
83.
by bordercases 3y ago
Supposedly a part of correcting an overshoot is possibly finding a hybrid.
84.
by bordercases 3y ago
I'm assuming that this wasn't a debate but a matter of open minded thinking.
85.
by bordercases 3y ago
How would you approach thinking about this in a way which makes the lawyers culpable rather than an acceptable part of the status quo?
86.
by bordercases 3y ago
Are you sure you can't be more specific? Wasn't MIRI studying the math of alignment precisely because one should be more specific about alignment? In your view, were they successful or misguided or what?
87.
by bordercases 3y ago
You would have to deal with the community's pseudointellectualism long enough to identify it as a pattern. Taken in isolation it looks like nothing, but the arc of the rationalist community has been insularity combined with CYA until a
88.
by bordercases 3y ago
He doesn't want to open himself to criticism from people that might actually do a good job of it.
89.
by bordercases 3y ago
As someone who has outgrown that particular community, Yudkowsky has a talent for acting in bad faith argumentatively while not appearing to do so. He relies heavily on convservational implicature and passing along the burden of proof (as h
90.
by bordercases 3y ago
An argument that makes all of its relevant assumptions clear and using precise distinctions would move "fairly obvious" and "seems to be so sure" and "sounds naive" into crisp statements about our knowledge. Th

More ›