bopbopbop7

7 ms·

61.
by bopbopbop7 9mo ago
Anecdotes don’t prove anything, ones without any metrics, and especially at MAANG where AI use is strongly incentivized. Evidence is peer reviewed research, or at least something with metrics. Like the METR study that shows that experienced
62.
by bopbopbop7 9mo ago
Please do provide some data for this "obvious value of coding agents". Because right now the only thing obvious is the increase in vulnerabilities, people claiming they are 10x more productive but aren't shipping anything, an
63.
by bopbopbop7 9mo ago
2022/2023: "Next year software engineering is dead" 2024: "Now this time for real, software engineering is dead in 6 months, AI CEO said so" 2025: "I know a guy who knows a guy who built a startup with an LLM i
64.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
Weird self roast but okay.
65.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
Over 30 years code artisan here. AI has made me 100x more productive. No, I will not provide proof. Sam Altman is the best.
66.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
So nothing about killing the profession, got it, so we were just vibing.
67.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
Nice wall of text, which part of that says painters jobs were killed? Or did you just read the title of the second article and not realize it’s not being literal but capturing the anxiety of the painters in the 19th century?
68.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
Do you have any evidence of all these "killings" of the profession or are you just vibing?
69.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
LLMs will not do what the camera did. LLMs have no anchor to reality like the camera, they simply optimize for the average. A camera is a whole new medium, an LLM is a statistical construction. Sorry to burst your AI bubble. LLMs will not b
70.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
The camera did not kill painting. And how does comparing a camera to an LLM even make sense?
71.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
Code writing was solved in 1997 when Dreamweaver was released.
72.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
I also hope that majority of the code in the future is AI assisted like it is with PostHog because my cyber security firm is going to make so much money.
73.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
What does it mean?
74.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
Your best examples of non-experts are two Linux power users?
75.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
It's not bringing out claws, it's just causing certain developers to out themselves.
76.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
You making a couple of small GUIs that could have been made with a drag and drop editor 10 years ago doesn't work against his claim as much as you think. You're just telling on your self and your "20 years" of supposed d
77.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
1. I didn’t ask for a repo. 2. Still wasn’t me. Maybe an AI agent can help you check usernames? 3. Sorry, a plugin for an AI code generator, which is even worse of an example.
78.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
Your best example of something you made with AI is another AI code generator… definitely not beating the AI bubble allegations anytime soon.
79.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
How many agents, tools, MCP & ACP servers, claude hooks, and workflows do I need to set up before English becomes a good programming language?
80.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
I did.
81.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
You’re right, I’m not making a nextjs/shadcn/clerk/vercel ai wrapper startup.
82.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
So you pushed a PR that breaks a bunch of tests, added a 5 layer nested if branch block that mixes concerns all over the place, then ignored the reviewer for three weeks, and you’re surprised they didn’t approve it?
83.
by bopbopbop7 10mo ago
Weird, AI writes terrible code for me that would never pass a code review. I guess people have different standards for good code.
84.
by bopbopbop7 11mo ago
My hacker news friends and I are all very high IQ and smart but everyone else is big dumb dumb.
85.
by bopbopbop7 11mo ago
Okay show the code.
86.
by bopbopbop7 11mo ago
Yes, that’s what I said. But you quoted some make believe point you are arguing against. LLM brain rot really got you, huh?
87.
by bopbopbop7 11mo ago
I never said any of that, look at my comment again. Or is the LLM replying for you also?
88.
by bopbopbop7 11mo ago
They are only meaningful and quality if you don’t know what you’re doing. But please do show some of this meaningful and quality work so I can be proven wrong.
89.
by bopbopbop7 1y ago
The for loop I wrote today is an Agent, at least that’s what I’m telling the investors.
90.
by bopbopbop7 1y ago
I simply asked for evidence to back up an unfounded statement. Which part of that was hostile and dismissive?

More ›