Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bonzoesc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
Doubtful, and what's the alternative? Somebody else hacking MIT in Sabu's name to make life difficult for him sounds much more likely, and hilarious.
62.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
fixed formatting, broke into paragraphs I used to think I was a pretty good person. I certainly didn’t kill people, for example. But then Peter Singer pointed out that animals were conscious and that eating them led them to be killed and
63.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
You may want to change it to a less-specific version so future patches (and they are coming) are less work to apply.
64.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
It's a tool, like a gun. If it's pointed at a computer you have authorization to exploit, it's good. If someone malicious is pointing it at you, it's not.
65.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
You'll need to change the version of rails listed in the Gemfile. I don't think "bundle update" modifies that.
66.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
But you've lost the abstraction of crediting somebody! Now you have to know about transactions to give out that credit, and while it might be more flexible, you've lost your encapsulation and abstraction. Option three would be suitable for
67.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
How is it more testable than the second option? previous = account.balance credit_amount = rand 1000 account.credit_dollars credit_amount assert_equal previous + credit_amount, account.balance And more importantly, how is optio
68.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
This particular exploit doesn't either.
69.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
This won't work if your Gemfile declares a version of Rails (Rails 3.2.9 did this). You have to update the Gemfile and then bundle update.
70.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
This won't work. The old version won't be purged, and it'll still be referenced in the Gemfile.
71.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
Update the version in your project's Gemfile, and run "bundle update rails".
72.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
> I've been a zipcar user for several years. I hope they have some more affordable rates coming up after this. Why would they lower their rates? Avis isn't a charity; they're in the business of making money. They know how much people ar
73.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
There's an undercurrent of gallows humor you're missing. Recognizing and being mindful of your shortcomings is wisdom.
74.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
Guess what? https://twitter.com/Skroob/status/285932353765908480 https://twitter.com/mrlanphear/status/285916924599205889
75.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
They're literally disrupting banking right now. Is accepting unreliability from financial institutions the disruption banking needs?
76.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
It means the UI isn't implemented in JavaScript or maybe that it doesn't support extensions. It's kind of a useless word to describe software. Fun drinking game: drink every time you see a github project, ruby gem, or Linux package labeled
77.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
> In some places, the high octane gasoline does not have ethanol in it but some cars do not run as well on high octane gas because the gasoline does not ignite at the most efficient time for the engine. I don't believe this is the case.
78.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
They're both simple video cameras, GoPro just has a more robust housing to make it into an action camera.
79.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
Wordpress handles load pretty badly without any caching enabled.
80.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
iCloud backups don't include all keychain items, while iTunes encrypted backups do: https://ssl.apple.com/ipad/business/docs/iOS_Security_May12.... page 12.
81.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
How is a web form going to give you any useful data about demand? There's no investment or interaction with actual users. If you want to assess demand, make a minimum viable product.
82.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
> You're saying it's better to invest months of time, thousands of dollars only to find nobody wants it? Why would you invest that much? If your minimum viable product takes months and thousands of dollars you're doing it wrong.
83.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
Nope, because you didn't believe in it enough to build it, instead choosing to waste time posting on websites. Zuckerberg didn't ask if he should build Facebook, the GitHub founders didn't ask if they should make GitHub, and Jason Fried did
84.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
I'm at Basho (we make the Riak database) in a non-security role, and I pay attention to CVE-IDs. They'll stick with me and make me remember a resume better, and improve somebody's chances of advancing to an interview, and give me something
85.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
If having fun making things with friends is "unironic brogramming," I'm proud to be an unironic brogrammer.
86.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
Do other rubies require specific support for installation tools? It seems like third-party installation tools should be the ones supporting ruby versions, and not the other way around?
87.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
California emissions regulations[1] gave them a reason to reengineer the fuel filler parts, and they built something that's inexpensive, genuinely nicer to use, and can be used by more people. I appreciate that they improved part of my $24k
88.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
What if the Drupal productivity is directly a result of the messiness?
89.
▲
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
> Having used both Drupal and Rails fairly extensively, I yearn for a Rails CMS with the community and variety of modules in Drupal. Why, if not for religious reasons? Drupal already exists, and there's no compelling business reason to
90.
▲
LivingSocial expected to lay off 400 in U.S.
(bizjournals.com)
41 points
by
bonzoesc
14y ago
|
43 comments
More ›