Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bonzini
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
43 ms
·
871.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
Fedora's dnf also uses SAT and it's way faster (with caching) than the handwritten resolver it replaced.
872.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
It's more complicated than that, Windows 95 would also check for programs intercepting INT 21h, sandwich its filesystem access routines in between and possibly call the old interrupt handler even when running from 32-bit programs. It&#
873.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
It won't disappear because it's a different market. A digital signage display is a large computer monitor. It has a remote, and typically also an RS232 interface to communicate what is pressed on the remote (as an alternative to H
874.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
Why is loss of eyesight not listed among the symptoms or consequences?
875.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
It has always been possible to write it in C++ since C++11, since acquire fences are cheap enough, but not in Java until loadFence() was introduced in JDK 8. The paper you cite proposed compiling an atomic add-zero to MFENCE+MOV, which is 5
876.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
Indeed the load/load fence must be before the "final long currentVersion" load—which in turn can be a relaxed load—not after the first load. On x86 this produces optimal code because the load/load fence does not need to
877.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
[not the parent] For sure it will not update to BUSL-licensed versions of Terraform as mentioned above, but I can't say if it will stay on an older version, use OpenTF, use Ansible or something else.
878.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
I wonder how many of these workarounds are needed with QEMU! Some of course will be needed because they are fixes for bugs in FreeBSD.
879.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
But money orders can be treated as fiat if enough people agree to do it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miniassegno
880.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
> Cash is the only fiat currency that actually exists There's also money orders.
881.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
So the first derivative was already understood to remain nonzero forever[1], now we know that the second derivative probably will also remain nonzero, and the third is slowing down but still positive for the moment? [1] IIRC in the 80s the
882.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
Ok, just add "usually" after "a self taught person".
883.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
I don't know about you, but I have read both of those assertions way too many times, typically from people that have failed a job interview or from "influencers" ranting about how big O questions are gatekeeping Stack Exchang
884.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
It is more typical of a self taught developer to complain about fizzbuzz, rather than talk about leetcode. These are both extremes but still, the average self taught developer is not the one who interviews for big tech exactly because he
885.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
And how often do you hear people complaining that "interviewers only care about useless stuff like complexity" and "why wouldn't you be able to look up complexities if you really need them" (which only shows that yo
886.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
Because you have to relearn all the foundational stuff. Algorithmic complexity, invariants or fundamentals of distributed systems may be useless as a junior developer, but once you proceed to more complex stuff it pays off that you have alr
887.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
It doesn't seem that the law makes it illegal to use a browser that bypasses the block, unless the content was already illegal.
888.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
Replace hackers with users.
889.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
It seems to be a version of safe browsing that is mandated by law to be a full block rather than a warning. It will be very easy to bypass, making this a very stupid law. It's slightly more worrisome that the law doesn't include a
890.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
> government being able to mandate that a certain website not open at all on a browser/system is uncharted territory and even the most repressive regimes in the world prefer to block websites further up the network (ISPs, etc.) so
891.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
Assuming you mean GitLab/GitHub, it's mostly one reason: the number of trees and developers makes a single repository unworkable, and neither GitLab nor GitHub have tools to manage pull requests that have to be shared and reviewed
892.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
Do you know IBM has any responsibility in this choice? If you do, the productive thing to do would be to cite your sources. If you don't, it would be to state which assumptions led you to blame IBM's leadership rather than Red Hat
893.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
If it makes you feel better, feel free to believe what you wrote. But it doesn't make it correct or accurate.
894.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
In fact the recent change basically consisted of going from 1 to 0 shipped stable branches (CentOS Stream is the mainline of RHEL). But most of those stable branches have never been public in the first place. In my opinion 99% of end users
895.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
No, CentOS/Alma/Rocky only supports one minor release at a time (that's up to four major releases for a 10 year lifetime). You can stick to a major release but you have to update every 6 months or you'll skip the securit
896.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
CIQ is selling rebuilt RHEL (Rocky) and Ansible.
897.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
You don't pay for the support requests, you pay for the work of letting you update to the next minor release at your own pace, having those updates be rock solid, and having security fixes even on older releases. In other words you pay
898.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
It's a fork that by definition is an exact reproduction of the thing they fork. So it cannot become a new, different standard.
899.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
Neither does knowing which parts of the book are darker or happier.
900.
▲
by
bonzini
3y ago
Yes, there's IOMMUs. On the other hand, datacenters have become so large that a 1% performance improvement can amount to millions of dollars in hardware and energy savings, so the extra cost of a microkernel might not be very welcome o
More ›