bonoboTP

23 ms·

361.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
Accountability - yes, you can fire a human. But you can also fire the AI, by switching to a different model or switching back to manual coding. The rest just depends on having a strong enough model.
362.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
Yes, I also felt that. FWIW Pangram says "moderately AI-assisted".
363.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
Copycats copy it, then it gets associated with subpar quality then the frontier guys adopt something fresh (or something deliberately currently-very-janky or retro/outdated associated) and the barber's pole of fashion rotates once
364.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
It's also artisanal coffee, craft beer pub and other hip things.
365.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
Poking one hole in the walls will always be easier than guarding the entire frontier. To defend properly, you need either either much more formally mathematically verified layers, or always-on online monitoring and intrusion detection runni
366.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
Owns? What a strange word to use. I doubt they own it in the sense that the profits of it go to their bank account. Use a better word and things will be clearer.
367.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
This type of game should be intuitive out of the box. It's something to kill time for most people, not something to study in detail before you even know if you like it.
368.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
Just allow me to put the things down without penalty and I then click a button like "Submit" or "I'm done" or "Check it", when I think I'm done.
369.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
No, that was regular minesweeper. The difference in this new version is that all the clues are revealed in the beginning.
370.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
Single click places an x instead of a sunflower. I solved the puzzle but placed those xes instead of sunflowers and was confused why it doesn't say I solved it. I would suggest making a single click be the main action, ie placing a sun
371.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
AI can do administrative tasks.
372.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
How would you do it if you hired an employee in your company to do it? You'd talk to the employee and read the docs they write. Same here.
373.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
This will work... if you think this is their true motivation, and the panopticon itself isn't the true end goal.
374.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
It cannot do logic. It just randomly generated a bunch of counterexamples to several open math conjectures. It's clearly unable to reason. It was all luck. Sure.
375.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
> We only do any of this shit because it's in the service of people. Where does the money come from that was used for those houses? From you? Oh, that's great, then keep handing out housefuls of money to people in your life th
376.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
> Now that we have that, everybody hates it. To me, it seems like a loud online minority, and it's mostly entangled with politics or job security. Most good programmers I know are using it effectively and like it.
377.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
This is a very shallow point. The whole question is about where the S curve ends. Nobody claims that it will literally progress beyond all physical limits and number of atoms in the universe and beyond energy constraints contained in the un
378.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
If the main job is teaching, then AI being good at proving theorems should not make OP worry about his job. Only AI being good at teaching would threaten that.
379.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
I agree. It's aesthetically pleasing to know that there are people out there thinking about deep beautiful and elegant concepts somewhere, it's a nice part of having a society to be able to afford supporting such people. They may
380.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
I consider "get paid to do X" to be equivalent to "you get to have your paid job and career as long as you do X". In that case research and papers qualify. Whatever is technically written in the contracts is just surface
381.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
This has already been shifting in science and engineering because typically large teams are needed to get things done. Math has held to it better, but even there they are almost always multi-named concepts, like Rivest-Shamir-Adleman etc. A
382.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
In academia they are paid to produce papers (and get some chores done like teaching), hopefully ones that can result in bombastic press releases, or winning awards. On a more abstract level they are paid to bring funding and prestige to the
383.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
No. The "only value" is the one that people decide to give you, based on their choice. This can be coordinated via taxation and redistribution, but it's still paid from someone to you. Someone has to decide that you doing thi
384.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
OP seems to need to touch some grass, spend time with friends and family, sit by the lake etc. Some sentences in there are quite disturbed. Regarding math, the new tools are humanity's achievements, they weren't handed down to us
385.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
People have been foretelling the S curve flattening for years now. At every jump of capability people confidently assert that no more progress is possible, it has reached a plateau, there is no way to go beyond this, it's a fundamental
386.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
"very plausible in 3 years of trends hold"
387.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
I don't see how that's relevant to the topic at hand. Average people's sentiment is not what will decide on whether jobs will be eliminated or not. It depends on model capabilities and people's self assessment of what&#x
388.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
To clarify: opus is not the same thing as έπος (épos), which is rendered as epic in English, both as adjective and noun. An έπος is indeed a type of long written work, but opus (work) is unrelated etymologically, they come from different Pr
389.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
> It's just a nonissue for most people. I'm not sure how relevant the sentiment of average people are regarding the future. People are generally not well tuned in to any such things. Things just happen to most of us and we spen
390.
by bonoboTP 3mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec's_paradox

More ›