bondarchuk

9 ms·

91.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
The title is "Out of light", "adjust" and "share" are just buttons picked up by the title-izer. Lol.
92.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
You can drink good coffee for the caffeine, too. I think anyone (not necessarily saying that's you) saying it's only about the taste and has nothing to do with caffeine is fooling themselves. The reason you were able to trick yo
93.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
I know nothing about this but JumpCrisscross seems to use "political" to mean "has donated large sums of money" while your use of "political" is more like.. someone who does politics.
94.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
Yes, see my other comment about primates https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47135674
95.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
Noted. But really, I'm also saying your description is wrong.
96.
The Coming War on General Computation(en.wikisource.org)
5 points by bondarchuk 8mo ago|0 comments
97.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
> As long as there's a country willing to build and sell ESP32s, I think it would be fairly easy to get hold of them. You could say the same about firearms. > Is a government really going to ban all electronics? All electronics
98.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
Submitted 6 days ago but flagged https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47059129 @dang can this get a second chance?
99.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
Do you really think that proves anything? It strikes me as a disingenuous argument.
100.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
I don't know why you keep doubling down. You can read in the text I linked that I'm right and you're wrong. Goodbye.
101.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
Shablulman is shadowbanned.
102.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
The context is "Anthropic treating models like people" which is 100% about consciousness, suffering, subjective awareness etc.. edit: in case you hadn't seen it, this kind of stuff https://www.anthropic.com/re
103.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
If they really think models can be conscious, they should just drop everything they're doing and never touch it again and try to convince anyone else to do the same. The half-assed safeguards they're implementing wouldn't b
104.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
I never denied that. I only said "It's really idiotic to posit that only things that eat and drink can suffer.". Don't just pattern-match everything to some vaguely related black/white issues.
105.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
I see several people say primates don't show the effect, however all tests on primates were done with a "language-competent bonobo" and "touchscreen trained chimpanzees (N=6) and gorillas (N=2)" that are first train
106.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
It's not about "understanding" that you or me do when we read a wikipedia article. It's about the mechanisms in the brain that encode things.
107.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
But then you are "pulling out the stops"! That sounds louder, doesn't it.
108.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
It shows that bouba-kiki is not sufficient, but it doesn't show that it is not necessary.
109.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
Yes, it's hard work to build a society where people behave responsibly and in their best interests. But I'd prefer we actually put in the effort rather than go for the easy authoritarian option out of basically laziness and contem
110.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
People are saying privacy is dead for decades, yet privacy continually declines more and more. And there's still quite a ways it can go from here. The defeatist attitude only helps further erosion.
111.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
It's kind of weird to me how every article on this topic here has people rushing to comment within a couple minutes with some generic "yes I too support ID checks for internet use!". Has the vibe really shifted so much among
112.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
It is a valid alternative avenue towards a legal implementation of "child safeguarding" IMO. Someone pays for the internet, that person is responsible for what minors do on their connection. If they have trouble doing that we can
113.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
I cannot find anything on google nor on google scholar under "core sight set" that has anything to do with language. In fact the term does not appear to exist at all.
114.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
I think GP is making a subtler point, not that listening to audio books is worse than reading books with your eyes, but that it's telling that people who listen to audio books themselves go out of their way to emphasize that it's
115.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
It's not about having to put in effort for the sake of it, the point is that building something by hand you will gain insight into the problem, which insight then becomes a valuable contribution.
116.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
They were not talking about MRI, there is a significant difference (purported).
117.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
They were not talking about MRI, there is a significant difference.
118.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
No, I am not talking about aura at all, I'm just saying that the physical, measurable sound that an instrument produces in response to being played, physically and measurably, could have more subtle effects on artistic performance (as
119.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
Everything is on the table if people vote for it.
120.
by bondarchuk 8mo ago
> whether there are any real, noticeable physical differences between the sound produced by a Strad and that produced by expert modern luthiers. Isn't this trivially true? I'm sure if you hook up both cellos to a bowing robot

More ›