bofadeez

11 ms·

121.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
Unless you're a full time quant with a high deflated sharpe ratio you have no business making trades. It's not an investment to speculate on unpredictable price, that's called gambling, as Eugene Fama explained. Investments y
122.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
This must be the first time as a far left liberal that you had a comment net downvoted just for saying demonstrably true facts? Frustrating huh? That's how it goes here if you don't conform to what others here would prefer to be t
123.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
Yeah reality TV is not a good source, but it's embarrassing that guests in America even felt slightly uncomfortable expressing their opinions. They're human beings who have the right to peacefully express any opinion they want.
124.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
If you let it happen to the extremists then it can also happen to the moderates next. What can't be tolerated is any law that restricts or hinders freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.
125.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
That's why the ACLU used to have principles and support extremist groups' right to speech. If they come for them, they'll come for you next. How can you mediate the boundaries of conversation? Every individual must be allowed
126.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
Clearly
127.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
You're confused. Silencing people is the thing 1A protects against. "I'm in favor of gun rights and that's why we need to eliminate the 2A" I don't think you get it lol. Your arguments are not consistent with y
128.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
I'm glad I live in a country where nothing you say or think or do can ever take away my natural right to speak any opinion in a peaceful way. If you don't already have freedom too, I hope someday your government will stop oppressi
129.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
> We genocided the native Americans That's also bad. But two wrongs don't make a right. Natives should have been afforded citizenship and constitutional rights also. The solution isn't to undo progress and take rights away
130.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
People in USA live in a constitutional republic based on self-evident natural rights given by god. We just have (somewhat) democratically elected representatives. In an "actual democracy" with no constitutional rights, the majorit
131.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
People in Europe are also human beings and so they also have a natural right to free speech. They just happen to live in oppressive governments willing to use violence against them for expressing their natural right to speak their opinion.
132.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
I think we can all agree on this. It would just be nice if there was consistent enthusiasm for the first amendment when it comes to actual taboo ideas. Are you quoting this when you hear about right wing extremists being canceled or jailed
133.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
Even a p-value is insufficient. Maybe can use some of this stuff https://web.stanford.edu/~swager/causal_inf_book.pdf
134.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
Has your lab tried using any of the newer causal inference–style evaluation methods? Things like interventional or counterfactual benchmarking, or causal graphs to tease apart real reasoning gains from data or scale effects. Wondering if th
135.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
Proof that forests are more resilient and responsive to co2 than previous models assumed.
136.
by bofadeez 11mo ago
Time traveler: "No, in 120 years we won't have moving sidewalks almost anywhere" Tech enthusiasts: "Oh what a luddite, didn't you see the demo? This is the future!"
137.
by bofadeez 1y ago
Okay, so one can "improve themselves" as a hobby at a leisurely pace instead of cramming for exams and becoming a competitive professional. Same thing. "Show me the incentive and I'll show you the outcome"
138.
by bofadeez 1y ago
Yeah it's interesting. What's the incentive to spend 10 years learning tedious stuff anymore? In another 1-2 generations all non AI knowledge will be gone.
139.
by bofadeez 1y ago
So brave. So courageous. (Slow clap). Not at all similar to something Michael Scott would say.
140.
by bofadeez 1y ago
"stop fighting with your IDE" wow it's like reading my mind. All I do is fight with IDEs 24/7
141.
by bofadeez 1y ago
I asserted the US is objectively not a full blown oligarchy. Therefore calling someone an oligarch is objectively propaganda.
142.
by bofadeez 1y ago
That's just a non-sequitur childish retort, but okay, if that helps you? Not much to chew on.
143.
by bofadeez 1y ago
A propagandist
144.
by bofadeez 1y ago
https://github.com/tebelorg/RPA-Python
145.
by bofadeez 1y ago
I've never taken an IQ test. I just care about intellectual honesty and was responding to someone who called for IQ testing as a prerequisite to posting on this forum. What's the next pivot in the argument?
146.
by bofadeez 1y ago
So you just affirmed "a business that believes hiring is better using IQ is not able to do so since the supreme court ruled that is racist" without realizing it. Not being consistent but it's okay. Great job lol
147.
by bofadeez 1y ago
https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0033-2909.1... full: https://www.talytica.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Schmidt-... proof provided. what's the next pivot now? can
148.
by bofadeez 1y ago
Duke Power Company was discriminating by IQ not race. It just happened to have been easier for white people to pass the IQ test at the time, but that's secondary. You're using the same logic used by Duke power Company's defen
149.
by bofadeez 1y ago
So now you're pivoting to saying Flynn Effect is just an observation of noise and human error with no meaning. You brought up the Flynn Effect, but you don't think it's meaningful to measure IQ? But you do think time series a
150.
by bofadeez 1y ago
If you had to pick 120 or 80, what would it be? You have no preference whether they can read or write? Notice you're cornered logically? Wouldn't you prefer to have a strong opinion based in reason?

More ›