Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bobkazamakis
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
271.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
a physical jail cell and a faraday cage and you'll only need to tighten the chains a little more!
272.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
>Just that once received mail is encrypted and can only be decrypted by your browser. Even that claim is false; they keep an escrow key that all of your browser keys are derived from anyway since you there isn't any way to bring you
273.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
better example might have been drag and drop file forms
274.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
People love to talk about cutting back immigration and how it'll magically solve housing problems when it only slightly reduces the demand. You'll never see any kind of valuation thrown, just good fee fees about keeping our jobs.
275.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
> These drugs are very powerful but have really bad side-effects for most people that take them for people that take larger doses and for longer periods, you're going to be dealing with that more frequently. It's not quite bina
276.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
>So your suggested system would be to do away with the jobs and just give the taxpayer money away? That's much more socialist. You need to incentivize people or they won't work. If you do away with the military, you might as we
277.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
correct. all it takes is one meth head telling buddies that it's the google for free electronics -- a perfect pivot for when they go public and sell the data further down the line, might as well just SaaS that part now.
278.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
he hasn't had any experience running a company that doesn't rely on subsidies in over a decade but I appreciate your optimism.
279.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
> In a sense federal jobs is socialistic I suppose, which is why you should want limited government. Before one spends a trillion that could be going to the welfare of the citizens themselves, yeah probably. >But you do need a militar
280.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
it's absolutely welfare. Just because you're working doesn't make it not a socialist policy for the benefit of those who join. You can have a jobs program that pays the civilians to dig the holes and the military to burn shit
281.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
the very cool systems integration between Federal and State in practice seems to mean that California problems are California problems? Similar to the legalization of marijuana by the states, it seems like problems are pushed under the rug
282.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
capitalism doesn't solve every problem.
283.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
You don't need 10 keys! You just need 1s and 0s! >You never need to press 10 keyboard keys at once https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chorded_keyboard Do you just hate everyone without 10 fingers? There's more
284.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
> Individualistic isn't bad. Individualism is the fundamental basis for thinking that individuals have intrinsic worth; take that away and you may not like the result. It's not that individualism is bad, that's a quality o
285.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
>Not to be rude, but the stereotype of the software developer is fast becoming one of fragility. A low wage worker spending their day working a fryer or a guy at a construction site would be thrilled to have such working conditions to wh
286.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
>unhinged >Sure bud, we are all white men with colonial baggage on this website. I guess some people live for the sigma but die from the ligma.
287.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
I don't see how changing the perspective of selling labor to ...selling labor really jumps the gap into psychosis.
288.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
sometimes the flowers arrange themselves, Jim.
289.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
ah yes, famously audio cannot be measured and does not have any quantitative properties.
290.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
...to respond to requests to their server? you can't establish a tcp connection without both ends.
291.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
>But it's not clear why Mozilla's apparent executive valuation of her is held to a separate standard Isn't it? Mozilla is pretty widely regarded as the last defense against complete browser monopoly. The Mozilla Foundation
292.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
>you are drawing conclusions about the labour market when there are likely very large and potentially unpredictable changes in store. ...isn't that the entire point of this particular thread? Looking at possibilities without necessa
293.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
I promise you HN is a statistical anomaly in a certain direction.
294.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
That man in front of me going too slow is an idiot! That man behind me going too fast is a maniac!
295.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
but you don't understand! This is taking away from AMERICAN profits from surveillance capitalism! Think of the jobs at stake!
296.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
It really bums me out when people don't understand basic microeconomics
297.
▲
by
bobkazamakis
5y ago
I'm storing sessions now? jesus what a disaster.