bobcostas55

56 ms·

1. 601.▲
   by bobcostas55 12y ago

   You can get paid for the spot when you leave it in the same way you paid for it when you took it. So I don't see how this is supposed to disproportionately affect poor people.
2. 602.▲
   by bobcostas55 12y ago

   Ah, the "modern web". Where hipsters have to take something that was perfectly fine and ruin it by re-implementing it badly in the latest fad language. Love it!
3. 603.▲
   by bobcostas55 12y ago

   How's Xenonauts? Have they made enough changes to justify the price?
4. 604.▲
   by bobcostas55 12y ago

   >and they have a mean assortment. This is one of those ridiculous lies that Swedes like to tell themselves. There are single stores in France and Germany with a larger assortment than the entire beställningssortiment. Anything even sligh
5. 605.▲
   by bobcostas55 12y ago

   I am so tired of clueless pundits talking about HFT...
6. 606.▲
   by bobcostas55 12y ago

   You're confusing stocks with flows. Wealth inequality and income inequality are completely different things, and Sweden being more unequal than the UK does not seem at all implausible. Here's one paper from a few years ago showing
7. 607.▲
   by bobcostas55 12y ago

   >For some low wage workers clearly bringing in more low skilled and semi skilled works does hurt them. How is that clear, exactly? The empirical evidence shows the exact opposite. You can start reading here: http://nber.org&#x