Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bobajeff
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
63 ms
·
871.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
This sounds like the thing Google is able to do with WaveNet. Just imagine the possibilities. Now we can have all Wikipedia entries read by Peter Jones, Morgan Freeman or Darth Vader.
872.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
I imagine this is for video site's that still have a lot of flv's which they'll never reencode but want to work on devices that don't have flash player.
873.
▲
Graphics world domination may be closer than it appears
(lwn.net)
2 points
by
bobajeff
10y ago
|
0 comments
874.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
No other than that it's meant to be used in much the same way and has some of the same developers working on it. This might help you: https://github.com/WebAssembly/design/blob/master/FAQ.md
875.
▲
Add llvm-objdump support for wasm file format
(reviews.llvm.org)
1 points
by
bobajeff
10y ago
|
0 comments
876.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
At some point in the "future [unicorn icon]" sure. But the design today is around the porting of C and C++ apps the web. The feature you're talking about is meant for integrating with the browser. It could allow emulating a v
877.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
No. GC access is a feature that they may possibly add at some undisclosed point in the future. (Just like it was with asm.js via Object Types IIRC) but it's not an explicit design consideration. No where does it say that it's inte
878.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
That is not the plan. WebAssembly is not some holy grail universal bitecode intended for every language. It is intended for C and C++ developers to be able run their code in a performant way on the web.
879.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
Yes. WebAssembly like asm.js is intended for porting C/C++ apps to the web. That said compiled languages should work if compilers add support for generating WebAssembly.
880.
▲
WebAssembly has reached the Browser Preview milestone
(webassembly.org)
3 points
by
bobajeff
10y ago
|
0 comments
881.
▲
Typing Chinese like English
(tedclancy.wordpress.com)
95 points
by
bobajeff
10y ago
|
73 comments
882.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
I don't really care why they removed them. I just don't want to jump through hoops just to use yet another desktop OS.
883.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
My only problem with the design is the lack of maximize minimize and close buttons in the windows. I could care less if it looks like Mac or Windows or whatever I just need to have those three buttons otherwise I'll just use my phone i
884.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
To further clarify SIMD.js (along WebAssembly's SIMD.js hooks) will change this. Right now you can still port GraphicsMagick to emscripten you'd just have to accept a performance hit on the parts that rely on SIMD.
885.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
This sounds to me like Mozilla is getting impatient with Servo. Servo was more than just a parallel browser engine it was the only new web engine not based off of decade old codebase. It was a statement that it's feasible to hold off o
886.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
Adblockers reduce the amount of requests a page makes, the amount of resources dom elements use up and the amount of malware that gets served to users. Being served static ads or sponsored content (already happening anyway) is still an imp
887.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
Well the over all problem here is that today only Apple and Samsung even make money on Smartphones. Not Sony, not HTC, not Motorola, not not LG, not Xiaomi, not Huawei neither of those make money from selling phone hardware. If they can
888.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
Yeah that's me I'm waiting for them to come out with one that's a replacement for a phone not some unjustifiably expensive accessory for a phone. That or just make phones smaller. My favorite flip phone is smaller than even t
889.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
Walmart yeilds quite a bit of market control. I'm not sure on the specifics though but they are a powerful retail force that's wrapped around many lives in the U.S.
890.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
As far as I can tell their market control is limited to just their devices which though still significant isn't enough for a breakup to make sense to me. That's not too say nothing should be done to prevent abuse of the control th
891.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
The only problem that I see is that our government didn't breakup companies more often. At&t needs to be broken up by region again. Along with Monsanto, Walmart, Comcast, Verizon, Google, Facebook and Microsoft.
892.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
Ultimately, the web is centralized because the architecture of the internet (which it's built on) is created that way. In essence users aren't part of the network the way servers are they are simply clients connected through a ISP
893.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
Ahh a fellow smartphone user! I can tell you've been sabatoged by the autocorrect gremlin. (waves = wages)
894.
▲
Add initial support for WebAssembly binary format
(reviews.llvm.org)
1 points
by
bobajeff
10y ago
|
0 comments
895.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
It works on my phone (in Chrome for Android) too!
896.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
People are hyping up webassembly way too much. Don't get me wrong it's going to be awesome being able to compile C++ and C programs that run on the Web runtime. But it's not going to be without it's own issues. For one d
897.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
Have never had an iPhone but I've exclusively used phones that have the stock Android experience (Moto G, Nexus 6). And to me nothing that Google has shown today is at a all threat to Apple (or Samsung for that matter). The only intere
898.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
My Nexus 6 from only a couple of years back however doesn't have Nougat and doesn't look like it's going to. It still work great though.
899.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
If they are caught they could: * Drop the product from the store completely. * Put a Warning Misleading Listing stamp on the listing. * Penalize the seller in the results.
900.
▲
by
bobajeff
10y ago
This is definitely going to break at least one phone
More ›