Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bob001
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
bob001
3mo ago
If I'm wrong in my thoughts then note how.
32.
▲
by
bob001
3mo ago
Yes, all that CO2 generated by nuclear power plants and renewable energy is terrible. But I guess if enough people die then Europe's carbon emissions will also go down so it's a win! And thank you for proving my point.
33.
▲
by
bob001
3mo ago
It's not a fully invalid view in Europe to an outsider's eye. There is a world where nuclear power and ACs were built to prepare Europe for this without increasing global warming. That world was blocked by environmentalists. Now i
34.
▲
by
bob001
3mo ago
And yet many Europeans will still argue that ACs are evil and they shouldn't have them despite an estimated 175k heat related deaths per year. Although maybe this heat wave will change some minds.
35.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
> using NDAs as a weapon like this. This is standard in companies. I've seen companies give a pittance in exchange for a binding NDA and the person took it because they needed to pay rent that month. Meta is evil but in this case so
36.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
Interesting, so that's the price you put on a life? And people say Americans are heartless capitalists.
37.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
Then it can separate the two separate components easily to satisfy whatever the law is. If it can’t then it is social media. A lot of YouTube is not knowledge sharing unless you view MrBeast as a sharer of knowledge.
38.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
Ah a strawmen augment. This is comparing two specific states. If you’re admitting that the two states of pre and post social media are the same by virtue of resorting to a strawmen then glad we agree.
39.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
> they’ll also lose access to educational videos on YouTube, local events on Facebook, and potentially cut off from distant friends and family. How in the world did kids ever survive before social media? Miracle of god keeping them sane
40.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
I am using the adjusted numbers. Official are 2k and scientist adjusted are around 12k. WHO's estimate for Europe is 175k. I do find all the European justification here to show a lot about what Europeans actually think of their own cit
41.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
Interesting how little lives are worth to Europeans given how many die due to heat each year. To beat America in indifference to one's own people is an actual achievement.
42.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
So despite a nicer climate more people die of heat in Europe than the US which just makes Europe look a lot worse.
43.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
> Why are there so many homeless people in the USA? If your assumption were to work, it would not be the case. Are you somehow assuming homeless people are all old retired people eligible for pensions? I literally cannot follow your logi
44.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
The same way a random redditor addresses concerns about their proof of Riemann Hypothesis.
45.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
That works only as long as people are employed and there are enough jobs to employ people. Simplest solution for a company is to outsource or automate jobs away as much as possible. After a couple years customers will adjust to the new norm
46.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
Isn't VAT generally a regressive tax so does the exact opposite of what the author thinks it does? The rich spend less versus their income than other demographics. I guess the UBI is to offset that but that just doesn't seem like
47.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
Money attracts those who seek money and those who seek money for the sake of money will as one would expect prioritize money above other things such as ethics as there is a natural feedback loop there.
48.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
Exactly, not just money for founders but money for engineers themselves. The same thing that attracted these personalities to other fields in the past (sales, business, etc.) which made the most money now attract them to tech.
49.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
That seems more like the tracing overhead than the python overhead. The original jit proposal would I believe not help at all with that since ML workloads basically do their own jit. The post being discussed however pushes for a general fra
50.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
Python software is to a large extent either doing things in not-python (c, c++, rust, etc.) or doing things that are not cpu bound (io bound, async, etc.). If you're cpu bound then you can either take a 2x jit improvement or take a 10x
51.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
I suspect there were people who had alternative proposals which got implicitly blocked by this 5 year effort. Letting a subgroup run wild without proper process is not good for a project this large.
52.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
I suspect the recent "we updated the GC without a PEP and it went live and caused massive issues and we need an emergency point release revert" pushed for a greater degree of process overall.
53.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
Python isn't a side project to yolo on. Updating the GC without a PEP caused massive issues for actual people using Python. If you want to impact software used by millions of developers then you better be willing to handle a bit of pro
54.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
There two main things: - Overly boastful language. Nothing is perfect, everything has limitations, etc, etc. If the creator isn't willing to admit that and be open about it then that just means users will hit those issue instead. - Say
55.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
The README makes me never want to use this. A career of seeing the same style from shit vendor salespeople has made me assume that under the hood is nothing but snakes.
56.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
I suspect they don't care. Their only goal is likely to get enough good PR to sell to some big tech or AI company for an absurd valuation.
57.
▲
by
bob001
4mo ago
Please use books. Please use the internet. Please use search engines. Please use AI. Everything old is good and everything new is evil. The irony of this being posted online in written form is lost on the author. Socrates would probably hav
58.
▲
by
bob001
5mo ago
It's not ugly. It's generic. That's the problem. Ugly can be eye catching. Generic will never be. Ferrari sells eye catching.
59.
▲
by
bob001
5mo ago
> will instantly recognize it, It looks like a generic Hyundai. If not for the badge I'd have assumed it was some Chinese mid tier EV.
60.
▲
by
bob001
5mo ago
Those aren't touch screen buttons. Clear in any non-frontal image of which there's plenty.
More ›