bo0tzz

5 ms·

31.
Deep Stack Engineer(glazkov.com)
1 points by bo0tzz 9mo ago|0 comments
32.
by bo0tzz 10mo ago
The system should undo state drift even if a run hasn't been prompted by changes to the upstream definitions in the repository
33.
RAII Guards and Newtypes in Rust(benjamincongdon.me)
1 points by bo0tzz 10mo ago|0 comments
34.
Mapping DNS(loc.place)
2 points by bo0tzz 10mo ago|0 comments
35.
Managing Postgres Extensions with ImageVolume(gabrielebartolini.it)
3 points by bo0tzz 11mo ago|0 comments
36.
by bo0tzz 11mo ago
I loaded up the hacker news dataset in google bigquery, which turned out https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42057647 as the biggest at 9624 comments. Second is https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43208973
37.
Show HN: Mapping DNS(loc.place)
5 points by bo0tzz 11mo ago|0 comments
38.
by bo0tzz 11mo ago
The post mentions 743 LOC records in the entire database; I'd be very curious to hear what that number's at now?
39.
Ret: Reverse Engineering Tool from FUTO(github.com)
5 points by bo0tzz 1y ago|0 comments
40.
The Geomys Standard of Care(words.filippo.io)
7 points by bo0tzz 1y ago|0 comments
41.
Experimental 3.5T K2 merge beats GPT-4.5 and Opus at writing(huggingface.co)
2 points by bo0tzz 1y ago|1 comments
42.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
1. It only works at all for internal PRs, not for forks. That is a limitation we'd like to lift if we could figure out a way to do it safely though. 2. It's running on a pretty big machine, so I haven't seen it approach any l
43.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
Dude, I built it, surely I'd know how it works...
44.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
> correctly classified as having user generated active content No it's not > PRs can be autodeployed to this domain without passing review or approval. No they can't There is no untrusted/user content on these domains.
45.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
As I've mentioned in several other comments in this thread by now: The whole preview functionality only works for internal PRs, untrusted ones would never even make it to deployment.
46.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
> unless one of the developers in the team published something malicious through that system If that happened we'd have much bigger problems than Google's flagging.
47.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
> Google flagged this domain for legitimate reasons. No they didn't.
48.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
There is no user generated content involved here.
49.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
I'm the guy that built the system, lol. Labels can only be added by maintainers, and the whole system only works for PRs from internal branches.
50.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
The Immich domains that are hit by this issue are -not- user generated content.
51.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
The workflow is fundamentally unable to deploy a PR from a fork, it only works for internal branches, as it relies on the container image being pushed somewhere which needs secrets available in the CI workflow.
52.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
Sounds like you're hitting an address that isn't backed by any service, not sure what the issue is.
53.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
If anyone's got questions about this setup I'd be happy to chat about it!
54.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
> what Immich is doing here is extremely dangerous You fully misunderstand what content is hosted on these sites. It's only builds from internal branches by the core team, there is no path for "external user" content to la
55.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
No, it doesn't work at all for PRs from forks.
56.
Google flags safe sites as dangerous(immich.app)
8 points by bo0tzz 1y ago|1 comments
57.
Google flags safe sites as dangerous(immich.app)
6 points by bo0tzz 1y ago|0 comments
58.
I'm bored, so here's a useless 0day(maia.crimew.gay)
6 points by bo0tzz 1y ago|2 comments
59.
Building a 1M node Kubernetes cluster(bchess.github.io)
3 points by bo0tzz 1y ago|0 comments
60.
by bo0tzz 1y ago
I'm not opposed to people having different opinions. What I am opposed to is people making a space actively hostile to others and hiding behind their "freedom of opinion".

More ›