bni

48 ms·

571.
by bni 16y ago
The article states that having an IDE with strong refactoring support is impossible for dynamic languages such as JavaScript. Is this true? in that case why?
572.
by bni 16y ago
For those of us that dont always write perfect code on the first try. Or have to clean up after others, refactoring tools such as extract method and intelligent rename are invaluable.
573.
by bni 16y ago
Absolutely. The game I currently sell in the app stores is built with web technologies and phonegap, so publishing it there will be a no-brainer. http://jsway.se/m/
574.
by bni 16y ago
Most of those are "mee too products". Not breaking new ground, and certainly not the best of options.
575.
by bni 16y ago
I think the article was spot on. This vague idea of elegance you mention is the "magic" that Steve Jobs refers to. To make that happen on the Linux desktop, a really talented developer with good design skills, have to start over from scratc
576.
by bni 16y ago
I Agree. A library you use might not align 100% with the type of game that you are developing, slowing you down, especially if you target mobile. The game I have built with web technology, Orbium ( http://jsway.se/m/ ), I choose to use no l
577.
by bni 16y ago
Legacy and inertia.
578.
by bni 16y ago
Wrong. There is nothing in a high level JavaScript API that is hardware, or even operating system dependent. Also, as I forgot to mention before, this API is already implemented in Chrome desktop browser.
579.
by bni 16y ago
Why doesnt Mozilla adopt the already widely deployed JavaScript touch API that is already implemented and widespread in Mobile Safari and in the Android Browser? I have used that API a lot lately in my project and it works excellent. The AP
580.
Orbium HTML5/JavaScript game(jsway.se)
2 points by bni 16y ago|0 comments